A familiar insight into the use of bibliometric terms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdh.v2i2.160Keywords:
Bibliometrics, Citation Databases, AltmetricsAbstract
The quantitative approach of citation and content analysis for academic journals, books, and researchers is known as bibliometrics. The number of times a specific work is mentioned by other resources is used to estimate the quantitative effect of a given publication. Inferentially, you can gauge the impact that a particular study has on the remainder of the academic literature. A compelling case for impact in a personal statement and qualitative peer review should always be added to bibliometrics. The foundation of bibliometrics is statistical sampling. It is predicated on a few presumptions. Each appraisal must take these presumptions into consideration. The essential tools that enable a user to comprehend the influence of a single published paper or of a researcher's body of work are citation databases and alternative metrics tools. citation databases and altmetrics tools can be used for the following things: to demonstrate the influence of a piece of writing by displaying how many times it has been referenced since it was published as well as assemble the sources that the publication's author used. It is used to locate and read the most important works in a specific topic and to research related literature and follow the progress of a certain publication.
References
Aristovnik, A., Ravšelj, D., & Umek, L. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 across science and social science research landscape. Sustainability, 12(21), 9132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219132
Basheer, N., Ahmed, V., Bahroun, Z., & Anane, C. (2024). Exploring sustainability assessment practices in higher education: a comprehensive review through content and bibliometric analyses. Sustainability, 16(13), 5799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135799
Biagioli, M. (2020). Gaming the metrics: Misconduct and manipulation in academic research. The MIT Press.
Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2012). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54(1), 86–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9245-0
Gholampour, S., Lim, W. M., Lund, B. D., Noruzi, A., Elahi, A., Saboury, A. A., ... & Gholampour, B. (2024). Does social media contribute to research impact? An Altmetric study of highly-cited marketing research. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 35(13-14), 1671-1701. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2024.2393339?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate
Hamdan, W., & Alsuqaih, H. (2024). Research output, key topics, and trends in productivity, visibility, and collaboration in social sciences research on COVID-19: A scientometric analysis and visualization. Sage Open, 14(4), 21582440241286217. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241286217
Hassan, W., & Duarte, A. E. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: a few suggestions. Current problems in cardiology, 49(8), 102640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102640
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Hutchins, B. I., Baker, K. L., Davis, M. T., Diwersy, M. A., Haque, E., Harriman, R. M., Hoppe, T. A., Leicht, S. A., Meyer, P., Santangelo, G. M. (2019). The NIH Open Citation Collection: A public access, broad coverage resource. PLOS Biology, 17(10), e3000385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000385
Kulikowski, K., Przytuła, S., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2024). ‘Homo Metricus’: The New Academic Worker. How Quantitative Research Evaluation Practices Reshape the Intellectual Capital Needed to Succeed in Contemporary Universities?. Higher Education Policy, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-024-00383-y
Kumar, M., George, R. J., & PS, A. (2023). Bibliometric analysis for medical research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 45(3), 277-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176221103617
Kumar, R. (2025). Bibliometric analysis: comprehensive insights into tools, techniques, applications, and solutions for research excellence. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 3(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202535k
Kurtz, M. J., & Bollen, J. (2010). Usage bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440102
Lemke, S. (2022). An assessment of impact metrics’ potential as research indicators based on their perception, usage, and dependencies from external science communication (Doctoral dissertation).
Mahi, M., Ismail, I., Phoong, S. W., & Isa, C. R. (2021). Mapping trends and knowledge structure of energy efficiency research: what we know and where we are going. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(27), 35327-35345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14367-7
Ng, J. Y., Judge, A., & Cramer, H. (2025). An altmetric analysis of the research literature about traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine. Advances in Integrative Medicine, 100506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aimed.2025.100506
Piwowar, H. A., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
Rousseau, R. (2014). Library science: Forgotten founder of bibliometrics. Nature, 510(7504), 218. https://doi.org/10.1038/510218a
Sakib, M. N., Kawsar, M., & Bithee, M. M. (2025). Continuous improvement through Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-08-2024-0173
Tao, Y., & Tao, Y. (2024). Integrating aesthetic education in quality education: A bibliometric analysis of sustainable development perspectives. Sustainability, 16(2), 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020855
Thelwall, M. (2021). Measuring societal impacts of research with altmetrics? Common problems and mistakes. Journal of economic surveys, 35(5), 1302-1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12381
Tomaszewski, R. (2023). Visibility, impact, and applications of bibliometric software tools through citation analysis. Scientometrics, 128(7), 4007-4028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04725-2
Vinayavekhin, S., Phaal, R., Thanamaitreejit, T., & Asatani, K. (2023). Emerging trends in roadmapping research: A bibliometric literature review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 35(5), 558-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1979210
Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: A bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y
Zhang, X., Xie, Q., & Song, M. (2021). Measuring the impact of novelty, bibliometric, and academic-network factors on citation count using a neural network. Journal of Informetrics, 15(2), 101140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101140
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Magenta Journal De Healthymedi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides direct open access to it's content on the principle that research is freely available to the public supporting a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published by Open Access will soon and forever be free for everyone to read and download. The license options defined for this journal are Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
