Synergy of Government, Community, and Private Sector regarding Effective Collaboration in Regional Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v1i4.120Keywords:
Regional Governance, Collaboration, Government Community Private Sector Synergy, Sustainable DevelopmentAbstract
This article is focused on how the government works with community and private players in enhancing good regional governance. Due to challenges like urbanization, environment, and even economic disparity, such other regional sectors can only enable development and enhance welfare through collaboration. The review also sketches out factors such as vision, appraisal of roles and responsibilities, trust and transparency that help to foster a successful collaboration. It also captures factors including conflicts of interest and objective, resource constraints, and policy and institutional constraints which facilitate the breakdown of the collaboration. Based on examples of countries and cities from across the globe, the review looks at practices that have proven the usefulness of cooperation, including Surabaya’s Green and Clean Program, the transformation of Medellin and the integration of the sound Region to show that partnerships with the ability to coordinate across different business sectors are capable of producing positive outcomes. Besides, it shows success stories and models of collaboration and highlights what promotes effective actions: involvement, commitment over time, and adaptability. Therefore, in line with the research objective, the review finds that effective coproduction initiatives are more likely to be socially sustainable when the collaborative relationships are strategic, based on mutual trust and shared vision.
References
Acosta, C., Mejía, D., & Zorro Medina, A. (2023). On the Tension Between Due Process Protection and Public Safety: The Case of an Extensive Procedural Reform in Colombia. Documento CEDE, (32). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4585682
Bapuji, H., Ertug, G., & Shaw, J. D. (2020). Organizations and societal economic inequality: A review and way forward. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 60-91. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5465/annals.2018.0029
Baragiola, G., & Mauri, M. (2021). SDGs and the private sector: Unilever and P&G case studies. SDGs and the private sector : Unilever and P&G case studies
Berka, A., & Dreyfus, M. (2021). Decentralisation and inclusivity in the energy sector: Preconditions, impacts and avenues for further research. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, 110663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110663
Braicu, C., & Drăghia, C. L. R. (2024). Effective communication in social work teams: A key to managerial success. Hyperion Economic Journal, 11(1), 25-31.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bühler, M. M., Calzada, I., Cane, I., Jelinek, T., Kapoor, A., Mannan, M., ... & Zhu, J. (2023). Unlocking the power of digital commons: Data cooperatives as a pathway for data sovereign, innovative and equitable digital communities. Digital, 3(3), 146-171. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital3030011
Cashore, B., Knudsen, J. S., Moon, J., & van der Ven, H. (2021). Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: Governance spheres for problem solving. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1166-1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12395
Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020). Collaboration, coordination, and cooperation among organizations: Establishing the distinctive meanings of these terms through a systematic literature review. Journal of management, 46(6), 965-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901565
Granqvist, K., Mattila, H., Mäntysalo, R., Hirvensalo, A., Teerikangas, S., & Kalliomäki, H. (2021). Multiple dimensions of strategic spatial planning: Local authorities navigating between rationalities in competitive and collaborative settings. Planning Theory & Practice, 22(2), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1904148
Gunnarsdóttir, I., Davíðsdóttir, B., Worrell, E., & Sigurgeirsdottir, S. (2021). It is best to ask: Designing a stakeholder-centric approach to selecting sustainable energy development indicators. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, 101968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101968
Hazarika, S. (2021). ‘On Reclaiming the Streets for the People’: Understanding Equity in Public Space Planning Strategies Through an Analysis of the Open Streets Program in New York City (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University).
Hussain, S., Maqbool, R., Hussain, A., & Ashfaq, S. (2022). Assessing the socio-economic impacts of rural infrastructure projects on community development. Buildings, 12(7), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12070947
Koolwijk, J. (2022). Rules, Power and Trust: Interplay between inter-organizational structures and interpersonal relationships in project-based organizations in the construction industry. A+ BE| Architecture and the Built Environment, (01), 1-174. https://doi.org/10.7480/abe.2022.01.6262
Lu, W., Wu, L., Zhao, R., Li, X., & Xue, F. (2021). Blockchain technology for governmental supervision of construction work: Learning from digital currency electronic payment systems. Journal of construction engineering and management, 147(10), 04021122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002148
Luthra, S., Sharma, M., Kumar, A., Joshi, S., Collins, E., & Mangla, S. (2022). Overcoming barriers to cross-sector collaboration in circular supply chain management: a multi-method approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 157, 102582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102582
Mack, D. Z., & Szulanski, G. (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and inclusion in strategy making. Long range planning, 50(3), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.08.004
Mandagi, D. W., Rantung, D. I., Rasuh, D., & Kowaas, R. (2023). Leading through disruption: The role of transformational leadership in the digital age. Jurnal Mantik, 7(3), 1597-1161. https://doi.org/10.35335/mantik.v7i2.4164
McEwan, C., Mawdsley, E., Banks, G., & Scheyvens, R. (2017). Enrolling the private sector in community development: Magic https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12283bullet or sleight of hand?. Development and Change, 48(1), 28-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12283
Prontera, A., & Quitzow, R. (2022). The EU as catalytic state? Rethinking European climate and energy governance. New political economy, 27(3), 517-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1994539
Qiao, X., Lee, H., Shen, Q., & Li, Y. (2023). Research on the Tripartite Evolutionary Game of Zero-Waste City Construction in China. Sustainability, 15(13), 10507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310507
Rakšnys, A. V., Valickas, A., & Vanagas, R. (2020). Challenges of creation and implementation of collaborative innovations in public sector organisations. Public policy and administration, 19(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.19.1.25989
Setyowati, A. B. (2021). Mitigating inequality with emissions? Exploring energy justice and financing transitions to low carbon energy in Indonesia. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, 101817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101817
Shiell, A., Hawe, P., & Kavanagh, S. (2020). Evidence suggests a need to rethink social capital and social capital interventions. Social science & medicine, 257, 111930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.006
Soni, A., Das, P. K., Hashmi, A. W., Yusuf, M., Kamyab, H., & Chelliapan, S. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of utilizing municipal solid waste as alternative building materials for sustainable development goals: A review. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 27, 100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2022.100706
Wardhani, B., & Dugis, V. (2020). Greening surabaya: the city’s role in shaping environmental diplomacy. Bandung, 7(2), 236-258. https://doi.org/10.1163/21983534-00702005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moccasin Journal De Public Perspective
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides direct open access to it's content on the principle that research is freely available to the public supporting a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published by Open Access will soon and forever be free for everyone to read and download. The license options defined for this journal are Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
