Strategy to Increase Public Participation in Monitoring General Elections in Papua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v1i4.121Keywords:
Public Participation, Election Monitoring, Political Repression, Civil Society OrganizationsAbstract
In this research, the approaches to enhance the public engagement in the monitoring of general elections in Papua, Indonesia a politically sensitive area with restricted freedom are explored. Employing both structured and unstructured research methodologies, the study identifies and examines the politics of exclusion, including political violence, distrust of the electoral process, and geographic constraints, as the chief causes of non-attendance at elections among citizens. As it can be seen from the above analysis, political victimisation, especially from political big-wigs and relevant local offices, appears to predominate as a barrier to stakeholder engagement. As the way forward for all these challenges, the study proposed an increase in the protection of whistle blowers, utilizing online means for remote monitoring of electoral activity, and CSO’s strengthening to improve electoral inclusiveness. Overall, the study accrues important findings on the ways that legal, technological, and community driven approaches advance democratic accountability as well as seek to achieve a more transparent electoral process in Papua.
References
Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950
Aeby, M. (2022). Navigating Channels for Civil Society Participation in Conflict Prevention and Peace-Making in the African Peace and Security Architecture. In Civil Society and Peacebuilding in Sub-Saharan Africa in the Anthropocene: An Overview (pp. 465-498). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95179-5_19
Brancati, D., & Penn, E. M. (2023). Stealing an election: Violence or fraud?. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 67(5), 858-892. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027221120595
Caselli, M., & Falco, P. (2022). Your vote is (no) secret! How low voter density hurts anonymity and biases elections in Italy. European Journal of Political Economy, 75, 102191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102191
Coslor, E. H., Crawford, B., & Brents, B. G. (2020). Whips, chains, and books on campus: How emergent organizations with core stigma gain official recognition. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(3), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618810812
Dutta, A., & Fischer, H. W. (2021). The local governance of COVID-19: Disease prevention and social security in rural India. World development, 138, 105234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105234
Faiz, P. M., Isra, S., Rachman, I. N., Ghoffar, A., & Fahmi, K. (2023). Big man, bag or ballot box? Upholding legal pluralism through noken as a traditional system of voting in elections in Papua, Indonesia. Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis, 55(3), 339-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/27706869.2023.2274167
Grömping, M. (2022). Agents of resistance and revival? Local election monitors and democratic fortunes in Asia. In Democratic Regressions in Asia (pp. 103-123). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003346395
Hernawan, B. (2017). Torture and peacebuilding in Indonesia: The case of Papua. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315644820
Hilbink, L., Salas, V., Gallagher, J. K., & Restrepo Sanín, J. (2022). Why People Turn to Institutions They Detest: Institutional Mistrust and Justice System Engagement in Uneven Democratic States. Comparative Political Studies, 55(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024299
Hira, A., & Busumtwi-Sam, J. (2021). Improving mining community benefits through better monitoring and evaluation. Resources Policy, 73, 102138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102138
James, T. S., & Garnett, H. A. (2020). Introduction: the case for inclusive voting practices. In Building Inclusive Elections (pp. 1-18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003051954
Kaiser, N., & Barstow, C. K. (2022). Rural transportation infrastructure in low-and middle-income countries: a review of impacts, implications, and interventions. Sustainability, 14(4), 2149. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042149
Karasik, R. J. (2020). Community partners’ perspectives and the faculty role in community-based learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(2), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825919892994
Kosec, K., & Wantchekon, L. (2020). Can information improve rural governance and service delivery?. World Development, 125, 104376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.017
Madore, F. (2020). Francophone Muslim intellectuals, Islamic associational life and religious authority in Burkina Faso. Africa, 90(3), 625-646. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972020000108
Marsden, C., Meyer, T., & Brown, I. (2020). Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation?. Computer law & security review, 36, 105373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105373
Merivaki, T., & Suttmann-Lea, M. (2023). Can electoral management bodies expand the pool of registered voters? Examining the effects of face-to-face, remote, traditional, and social media outreach. Policy Studies, 44(3), 377-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2022.2044020
Monteiro, A., & Leite, C. (2021). Digital literacies in higher education: Skills, uses, opportunities and obstacles to digital transformation. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 21(65). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.438721
Norris, P. (2013). The new research agenda studying electoral integrity. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.015
Partheymüller, J., Müller, W. C., Rabitsch, A., Lidauer, M., & Grohma, P. (2022). Participation in the administration of elections and perceptions of electoral integrity. Electoral Studies, 77, 102474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102474
Permatasari, P., Budiarso, A., Dartanto, T., Samosir, A. P., Saputro, B., Ekayana, D., ... & Wardhana, I. W. (2024). Village fund management and reporting systems: are they accountable?. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(4), 512-528. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2023-0098
Saner, R., Yiu, L., & Nguyen, M. (2020). Monitoring the SDGs: Digital and social technologies to ensure citizen participation, inclusiveness and transparency. Development policy review, 38(4), 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12433
Sloan Morgan, V. (2020). “Why would they care?”: Youth, resource extraction, and climate change in northern British Columbia, Canada. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 64(3), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12605
Solheim, A., Capobianco, V., Oen, A., Kalsnes, B., Wullf-Knutsen, T., Olsen, M., ... & Strout, J. M. (2021). Implementing nature-based solutions in rural landscapes: barriers experienced in the PHUSICOS project. Sustainability, 13(3), 1461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031461
Tertytchnaya, K. (2023). " This Rally is Not Authorized": Preventive Repression and Public Opinion in Electoral Autocracies. World Politics, 75(3), 482-522. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2023.a900711
Toros, E., & Birch, S. (2021). How citizens attribute blame for electoral violence: regional differences and party identification in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 21(2), 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2021.1915642
Vian, T. (2020). Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health: concepts, frameworks, and approaches. Global health action, 13(sup1), 1694744. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1694744
Zielinski, S., Kim, S. I., Botero, C., & Yanes, A. (2020). Factors that facilitate and inhibit community-based tourism initiatives in developing countries. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(6), 723-739. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1543254
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moccasin Journal De Public Perspective

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides direct open access to it's content on the principle that research is freely available to the public supporting a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published by Open Access will soon and forever be free for everyone to read and download. The license options defined for this journal are Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)










