Examining the Influence of Bureaucratic Culture on Organizational Performance in Public Agencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v1i1.16Keywords:
Bureaucratic Culture, Organizational Performance, Public AgenciesAbstract
This take a look at examines the influence of bureaucratic subculture on organizational performance in public agencies via a combined-methods method. Descriptive facts analysis of survey records exhibits moderate to excessive degrees of hierarchy, formalization, and centralization, indicating the prevalence of bureaucratic norms within the groups. Additionally, organizational performance indicators show wonderful perceptions of effectiveness and employee delight, albeit with room for improvement in performance. The findings underscore the importance of balancing bureaucratic systems with organizational effectiveness, emphasizing the need for adaptability and innovation in public provider delivery.
References
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2009). Centralization, organizational strategy, and public service performance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 19(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum039
Berman, E. M., Bowman, J. S., West, J. P., & Van Wart, M. R. (2021). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. Cq Press.
Bondarouk, T., & Friebe, C. M. (2014). Shared services—standardization, formalization, and control: a structured literature review. Shared services as a new organizational form, 39-65.
Boylan, S. A., & Turner, K. A. (2017). Developing organizational adaptability for complex environment. Journal of Leadership Education, 16(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.12806/V16/I2/T2
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Røvik, K. A. (2020). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. Routledge.
Fleming, C. J. (2020). Prosocial rule breaking at the street level: The roles of leaders, peers, and bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 22(8), 1191-1216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619817
Floridi, L. (2024). AI as agency without intelligence: On artificial intelligence as a new form of artificial agency and the multiple realisability of agency thesis. Available at SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5135645
Gonçalves, S. (2024). Leadership, ethics, and innovative approaches in higher education. The Bloomsbury Handbook of Values and Ethical Change in Transformative Leadership in Higher Education, 144-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1877-636120140000013003
Gregory, B. T., Harris, S. G., Armenakis, A. A., & Shook, C. L. (2009). Organizational culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes. Journal of business research, 62(7), 673-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.021
Hales, C. (2002). ‘Bureaucracy‐lite’and continuities in managerial work. British Journal of management, 13(1), 51-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00222
Heilbron, M., Armeni, K., Schoffelen, J. M., Hagoort, P., & De Lange, F. P. (2022). A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(32), e2201968119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201968119
Ingvaldsen, J. A., & Engesbak, V. (2020). Organizational learning and bureaucracy: an alternative view. The Learning Organization, 27(5), 403-415.
Inkoom, E. A. (2024). Participatory Decision Making and Employee Performance at Public Utilities Regulatory Commission, Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Coast).
Jordan, J. J., Yoeli, E., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Don’t get it or don’t spread it: Comparing self-interested versus prosocial motivations for COVID-19 prevention behaviors. Scientific reports, 11(1), 20222.Kakavelakis, K., & Edwards, T. J. (2022). The impact of structure and corporate ideology on leader–follower relations in the bureaucratic organization: a reflection on moral mazes. Journal of business ethics, 181(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04919-9
Kattel, R., Drechsler, W., & Karo, E. (2022). How to make an entrepreneurial state: Why innovation needs bureaucracy. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97617-5
Lesmana, D., Rosadi, B., Hermana, D., Liu, R., & Winarno, A. (2022). Analyzing the effect of bureaucratic leadership on public service motivation and job performance. Journal of Local Government Issues, 5(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v5i2.20904
Monteiro, P., & Adler, P. S. (2022). Bureaucracy for the 21st century: Clarifying and expanding our view of bureaucratic organization. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 427-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4008916
Ritz, A. (2009). Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government. International review of administrative sciences, 75(1), 53-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020852308099506
Sihite, O. B., Andika, C. B., & Prasetya, A. B. (2020). A Literature Review: Does Transformational Leadership impact and Effective in the Public Bureaucratic. International Journal of Social, Policy and Law, 1(1), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v1i1.16
Van Aelst, P., Toth, F., Castro, L., Štětka, V., Vreese, C. D., Aalberg, T., ... & Theocharis, Y. (2021). Does a crisis change news habits? A comparative study of the effects of COVID-19 on news media use in 17 European countries. Digital Journalism, 9(9), 1208-1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1943481
Verpaalen, I. A. M. (2024). How resistance to innovation unfolds: Uncertainty and pressure to change as barriers to innovation adoption. Sl: sn.
White, S., Foster, R., Marks, J., Morshead, R., Goldsmith, L., Barlow, S., ... & Gillard, S. (2020). The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC psychiatry, 20, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02923-3
Whitehouse, H. (2021). The ritual animal: Imitation and cohesion in the evolution of social complexity. Oxford University Press
Wise, L. R. (2004). Bureaucratic posture: On the need for a composite theory of bureaucratic behavior. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 669-680. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00414.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Moccasin Journal De Public Perspective
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides direct open access to it's content on the principle that research is freely available to the public supporting a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published by Open Access will soon and forever be free for everyone to read and download. The license options defined for this journal are Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
