Comparative Study of Autonomous and Centralist Government Systems in the Context of Public Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v1i1.18Keywords:
Autonomous Authorities, Centralist Authorities, Public Management, Citizen SatisfactionAbstract
This study conducts a comparative evaluation of self-reliant and centralist authorities’ structures inside the framework of public management, that specialize in governance systems, selection-making methods, and citizen satisfaction. The method includes descriptive statistics, paired-samples t-exams, multiple regression evaluation, ANCOVA, and Pearson correlational analyses. Key findings monitor good sized variations in citizen pleasure and choice-making effectiveness between autonomous and centralist systems, with residents in independent systems reporting better pride stages. Policy interventions also caused amazing increases in pride across each structure. Regression analysis highlights the role of governance structure and carrier pleasant as giant predictors of citizen pleasure. Correlational analyses further emphasize the wonderful relationships between citizen satisfaction, service great, and accessibility. This study contributes insights into effective governance fashions and informs policymaking for more suitable public provider shipping.
References
Alanazi, F. (2023). Electric vehicles: benefits, challenges, and potential solutions for widespread adaptation. Applied sciences, 13(10), 6016. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106016
Amadu, M. F. (2023). Community radio broadcasting and local governance participation in Ghana: a study of Simli Radio in the Kumbungu District of the Northern Region (Doctoral dissertation, University of Westminster).
Atisa, G., Zemrani, A., & Weiss, M. (2021). Decentralized governments: local empowerment and sustainable development challenges in Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 3349-3367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00722-0
Burghardt, G. M., Pellis, S. M., Schank, J. C., Smaldino, P. E., Vanderschuren, L. J., & Palagi, E. (2024). Animal Play and Evolution: Seven Timely Research Questions about Enigmatic Phenomena. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105617
Chan, K. M., Boyd, D. R., Gould, R. K., Jetzkowitz, J., Liu, J., Muraca, B., ... & Brondízio, E. S. (2020). Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People and Nature, 2(3), 693-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10124
Dick-Sagoe, C. (2020). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1804036. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036
ESCAP, U. (2021). Digital government and transformation.
Felder, F. (2023). Local governance in the Swiss Federal System. Comparative and alternative approaches to the traditional paradigm. In Local Governance in Multi-Layered Systems: A Comparative Legal Study in the Federal-Local Connection (pp. 63-82). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Grumbach, J. (2022). Laboratories against democracy: How national parties transformed state politics (Vol. 184). Princeton University Press.
Klein, V. B., & Todesco, J. L. (2021). COVID‐19 crisis and SMEs responses: The role of digital transformation. Knowledge and process management, 28(2), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1660
Le Galès, P. (2021). The rise of local politics: A global review. Annual review of Political science, 24, 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102158
McArthur, J. J., & Powell, C. (2020). Health and wellness in commercial buildings: Systematic review of sustainable building rating systems and alignment with contemporary research. Building and environment, 171, 106635.
Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries., 18(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x
Noory, B., Hassanain, S., Edwards, J., & Lindskog, B. V. (2021). Perceived consequences of healthcare service decentralization on access, affordability and quality of care in Khartoum locality, Sudan. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 581. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06479-0
Numerato, D., Čada, K., & Honová, P. A. (2020). Citizenship, Neoliberalism and Healthcare. In Health and Illness in the Neoliberal Era in Europe (pp. 75-89). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Okorie, C. O., Ogba, F. N., Iwuala, H. O., Arua, C., Felix, N., & Nwosumba, V. C. (2022). Decentralization of South Eastern Nigeria’s Local Governments and Achievement of Mandates Enshrined in Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution. SAGE open, 12(2), 21582440221089975. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221089975
Peterson, F. (2020). Expounding the Constitution. Yale LJ, 130, 2.
Roy, S., & Mitra, S. (2023). Enhancing Bilateral Relations and Regional Cooperation: Analysing the Feasibility and Implications of India–Myanmar Railway Connectivity. South Asian Survey, 30(1), 72-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/09715231231207555
Salsman, R. M. (2017). America at Her Best Is Hamiltonian. The Objective Standard, 12(1).
Savaşkan, O. (2021). Political dynamics of local government reform in a development context: The case of Turkey. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(1), 204-225.
Schenkel, W., & Plüss, L. (2021). Spatial Planning and Metropolitan Governance in Switzerland: A Condensed Overview. disP-The Planning Review, 57(4), 4-11.
Sianipar, C. P., Chao, Y. M., & Hoshino, S. (2023). Multi-actor systems in water–energy nexus: Identifying critical stakeholders in floatovoltaic (floating photovoltaic) project. Water, 15(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061241
Sonnenfeld, A., Stevenson, J., & Waddington, H. S. (2024). Does citizen engagement improve development outcomes? A realist-informed systematic review of participation and accountability mechanisms. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 16(1), 27-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2022.2153380
Staff, H. (2020). The Political Economy of Private Security: How European States Privatize, Regulate and Produce Domestic Security (Vol. 24). Lit Verlag.
Steenmans, K., Taylor, P., & Steenmans, I. (2021). Blockchain technology for governance of plastic waste management: Where are we?. Social Sciences, 10(11), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10110434
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Moccasin Journal De Public Perspective
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides direct open access to it's content on the principle that research is freely available to the public supporting a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published by Open Access will soon and forever be free for everyone to read and download. The license options defined for this journal are Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
