The Influence of Women’s Political Representation Quotas on Gender-Sensitive Policy Formulation in Local Parliaments in West Sumatra

Muhammad Rizky

doi:10.37899/mjdpp.v2i2.263

Authors

Muhammad Rizky Center for Gender and Governance Studies, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v2i2.263

Keywords:

Women’s Political Representation, Gender Quotas

Abstract

This study examines the influence of women’s political representation quotas on gender-sensitive policy formulation in local parliaments in West Sumatra, Indonesia. While legal quotas have increased the numerical presence of women legislators, their substantive impact on policymaking remains constrained by institutional hierarchies, party dynamics, and cultural norms. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with female and male legislators, party officials, and civil society actors, complemented by document analysis of parliamentary reports and local regulations. The findings reveal that women’s participation often remains symbolic, with significant barriers limiting their influence on strategic policy areas. Successful gender-sensitive policies, particularly in maternal health, domestic violence, and education, were achieved primarily through coalition-building, strategic committee engagement, and collaboration with civil society. The study underscores that quotas alone are insufficient to ensure substantive gender equality in policymaking, highlighting the importance of institutional reforms, capacity-building, and cultural change to empower women legislators and promote comprehensive gender-sensitive governance.

References

Awusi, M., Addae, D., & Kwapong, O. A. T. F. (2023). Tackling the legislative underrepresentation of women in Ghana: empowerment strategies for broader gender parity. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100717

Bessell, S. (2010). Gender and social policy in Southeast Asia: Women, welfare and governance. Routledge.

Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00539.x

Clayton, A. (2021). How do electoral gender quotas affect policy?. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102019

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dahlerup, D. (2006). The story of the theory of critical mass. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06260117

Firdaus, F., & Wulandari, R. A. (2023). Implications of Low Women's Representation: Strategies and Challenges Towards Gender Equality in Indonesian Politics. Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 5(2), 138-153. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v5i2.383

Freidenvall, L. (2021). Equal representation without legislation: gender, power, and institutions in Sweden. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.

Freidenvall, L., Dahlerup, D., & Skjeie, H. (2006). The Nordic countries: An incremental model. In D. Dahlerup (Ed.), Women, quotas and politics (pp. 55–82). Routledge.

Garba, S. (2025). Gender Parity and Gender Legislation in Nigeria: An Assessment of Descriptive Representation in the Kwara State Legislature. University of Jos Journal of Political Science, 2(2), 160-180.

Górecki, M. A., & Pierzgalski, M. (2022). Legislated candidate quotas and women's descriptive representation in preferential voting systems. European journal of political research, 61(1), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12443

Goswami, I., Balakrishnan, S., Vinotha, C., Chopra, R., Sivakumar, V., & DM, C. (2023). Gender And Politics: Examining Women's Representation And Empowerment. Journal of Namibian Studies, 33.

Gould, J. S. (2021). The Law of Legislative Representation. Virginia Law Review, 107(4), 765-843.

Guido, L., Walsh, L., & Banaszak, L. A. (2023). Understanding feminist governance through feminist institutionalism: an overview. Handbook of Feminist Governance, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374812.00009

Hassim, S. (2006). Women’s organizations and democracy in South Africa: Contesting authority. Development Southern Africa, 23(5), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350601021221

Höhmann, D. (2021). Electoral Incentives, Critical Actors, and the Substantive Representation of Women in Parliament (Doctoral dissertation, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Fakultät Sozial-und Wirtschaftswissenschaften).

Mackay, F., & Krook, M. L. (2011). Gender, politics and institutions: Towards a feminist institutionalism. Politics & Gender, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X10000560

Mori, Y. (2024). Gender Quotas as Catalysts for Change: A Comprehensive Review of Gender Quotas in Politics. Women Leadership, Decentralised Governance and Development: Perspectives from Indian States, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3709-3_2

Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford University Press.

Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.

Stout, C. T., Tate, K., & Wilson, M. (2021). Does Black representation matter? A review of descriptive representation for African Americans in legislative offices. National Review of Black Politics, 2(1), 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1525/nrbp.2021.2.1.2

Verge, T. (2022). A chamber of one's own: institutional claim-making on gender equality and the symbolic role of parliaments. Politics & Gender, 18(1), 95-125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000252

Wang, S. (2023). Do women always represent women? The effects of gender quotas on substantive representation. Political Behavior, 45(4), 1979-1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09808-z

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Yuda, T. K., & Kühner, S. (2023). Bringing Indonesia into the global welfare regime debate: A literature review and future research agenda. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 17(2), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12275