Youth Participation in Climate Change Movements: A Sociopolitical Perspective on Environmental Activism in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v2i1.276Keywords:
Youth Activism, Climate Change, Sociopolitical, EngagementAbstract
Youth participation in climate change movements is increasingly vital in addressing environmental challenges, especially in vulnerable countries like Indonesia. This study explores youth engagement in climate activism from a sociopolitical perspective, focusing on motivations, strategies, and structural factors influencing participation. Using a qualitative approach, data were gathered through interviews, focus groups, and observations with young activists from diverse backgrounds. Findings show that personal experiences with environmental risks, moral responsibility, and social awareness drive activism. Sociopolitical elements such as access to resources, institutional backing, and government policies can either support or hinder involvement. Youth activists combine digital advocacy with community-based initiatives to amplify impact and reach varied audiences. The study highlights how individual agency, networks, and structural contexts interact to shape activism’s effectiveness. By examining these dynamics, the research provides insights into the motivations and challenges faced by young activists and offers recommendations for policymakers, educators, and organizations to strengthen youth engagement through inclusive and supportive strategies.
References
Ahmad, I., & Islam, M. R. (2024). Empowerment and participation: Key strategies for inclusive development. In Building strong communities: Ethical approaches to inclusive development (pp. 47-68). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-174-420241003
Akpe, O. E. E., Mgbame, A. C., Ogbuefi, E., Abayomi, A. A., & Adeyelu, O. O. (2023). Technology acceptance and digital readiness in underserved small business sectors. Journal of Frontiers in Multidisciplinary Research, 4(1), 252-268. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJFMR.2023.4.1.252-268
Aly, A., Blackmore, J., Bright, D., Hayes, D., McKay, A., Lingard, B., ... & Youdell, D. (2022). Reflections on how education can be for democracy in the twenty-first century. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 54(3), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2022.2084052
Briandana, R., & Saleh, M. S. M. (2022). Implementing environmental communication strategy towards climate change through social media in Indonesia. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 12(4), e202234.
Ciptadi, S. G., & Zainubi, H. H. (2024). Collaborative action as strategy in “global climate strike” campaign of greenpeace indonesia. CoverAge: Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(1), 1-11.
de Guzman, E., Malarich, R., Large, L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2018). Inspiring resident engagement: identifying street tree stewardship participation strategies in environmental justice communities using a community-based social marketing approach. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 44(6). https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2018.026
Fisher, D., Svendsen, E., & Connolly, J. (2015). Urban environmental stewardship and civic engagement: how planting trees strengthens the roots of democracy. Routledge.
Grimes, S. (2003). The digital economy challenge facing peripheral rural areas. Progress in Human Geography, 27(2), 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph421oa
Hadi, M. J., & Junaidi, M. (2021, March). Changes and challenges of participating in focus group discussion. In Ninth International Conference on Language and Arts (ICLA 2020) (pp. 145-149). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210325.027
Hilder, C., & Collin, P. (2022). The role of youth-led activist organisations for contemporary climate activism: the case of the Australian Youth Climate Coalition. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(6), 793-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2054691
Hohenhaus, M., Boddy, J., Rutherford, S., Roiko, A., & Hennessey, N. (2023). Engaging young people in climate change action: A scoping review of sustainability programs. Sustainability, 15(5), 4259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054259
Jawed, R., Lodhi, M. S., & Salim, M. (2023). Youth Engagement and Political Activism in Contemporary Pakistan: A Sociopolitical Analysis. Pakistan JL Analysis & Wisdom, 2, 224.
Lamichhane, Y. R., & Dhakal, B. R. (2024). Why and how South Asian youth are involved in politics: a systematic review of literature. Handbook on Youth Activism, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803923222.00016
Lloyd-Evans, S. (2016). Focus groups, community engagement, and researching with young people. In Methodological Approaches (pp. 1-23). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-89-7_16-1
Martusewicz, R. A., & Edmundson, J. (2014). Social foundations as pedagogies of responsibility and eco-ethical commitment. In Teaching Social Foundations of Education (pp. 71-92). Routledge.
Nash, A., Kennedy, H., Abraczinskas, M., Ballonoff Suleiman, A., & Ozer, E. J. (2024). Examining the intersection of sociopolitical development and transformative social and emotional learning outcomes: an integrated approach in youth participatory action research. Youth, 4(2), 679-699. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth4020046
Okedele, P. O., Aziza, O. R., Oduro, P., & Ishola, A. O. (2024). Human rights, climate justice, and environmental law: Bridging international legal standards for social equity. Human Rights, 20(12), 232-241.
Omweri, F. S. (2024). A systematic literature review of e-government implementation in developing countries: examining urban-rural disparities, institutional capacity, and socio-cultural factors in the context of local governance and progress towards SDG 16.6. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(8), 1173-1199. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.808088
Pena-Vega, A., Cohen, M., Flores, L. M., Le Treut, H., Lagos, M., Castilla, J. C., ... & Marquet, P. (2022). Young people are changing their socio-ecological reality to face climate change: Contrasting transformative youth commitment with division and inertia of governments. Sustainability, 14(22), 15116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215116
Pingali, P. (2023). Are the lessons from the green revolution relevant for agricultural growth and food security in the twenty-first century. Agricultural development in Asia and Africa, 21-32.
Postma, D. W. (2006). Why care for nature? In search of an ethical framework for environmental responsibility and education. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Pulatovna, K. K. (2024). Main factors in the development of ethical education of youth. Web of Discoveries: Journal of Analysis and Inventions, 2(12), 12-20.
Siregar, I. (2024). Phenomenological Review of the Issue of Political Apathy of Indonesia's Young Generation. Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics, 4(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.33258/polit.v4i2.1159
Sloam, J., Pickard, S., & Henn, M. (2022). Young people and environmental activism: The transformation of democratic politics. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(6), 683-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2056678
Sovacool, B. K., Newell, P., Carley, S., & Fanzo, J. (2022). Equity, technological innovation and sustainable behaviour in a low-carbon future. Nature human behaviour, 6(3), 326-337.
Tafon, R., & Saunders, F. (2025). Toward transformative youth climate justice: Why youth agency is important and six critical areas for transformative youth activism, policy, and research. PLOS Climate, 4(4), e0000472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000472
Yliniva, K., Bryan, A., & Brunila, K. (2024). ‘The future we want’?–the ideal twenty-first century learner and education’s neuro-affective turn. Comparative Education, 60(3), 498-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2024.2363096
Zimba, J. M., Simbeye, B., & Chirwa, S. C. (2021). Towards intergenerational equity: Analysis of youth engagement strategies in climate action planning in Mzuzu, Malawi. Urban Planning, 6(4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i4.4383
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Moccasin Journal De Public Perspective

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides direct open access to it's content on the principle that research is freely available to the public supporting a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published by Open Access will soon and forever be free for everyone to read and download. The license options defined for this journal are Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

