Legal Enforcement Challenges in Implementing Environmental Impact Assessment (AMDAL) Regulations in the Mining Sector in Kalimantan

Muhammad Gaffar Arifuddin

doi:10.37899/mjdpp.v2i4.285

Authors

Muhammad Gaffar Arifuddin Legal Studies Program, Sebelas Padjadjaran University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v2i4.285

Keywords:

Environmental Law Enforcement, AMDAL , Mining Governance, Socio-Legal Analysis

Abstract

This study examines the challenges of legal enforcement in implementing Environmental Impact Assessment (AMDAL) regulations within the mining sector in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Although AMDAL is designed as a key preventive legal instrument to integrate environmental considerations into development planning, its enforcement remains weak, inconsistent, and highly influenced by political interests. Using a qualitative socio-legal approach, this research draws on documentary analysis, semi-structured interviews with government officials, mining company representatives, and community members, as well as field observations conducted in East, Central, and South Kalimantan. The findings reveal three interrelated dimensions of enforcement failure. First, institutional fragility persists due to limited technical capacity, insufficient budgets, and fragmented coordination among environmental agencies. Second, selective enforcement practices emerge through corporate–political collusion, undermining the rule of law and reducing AMDAL to a procedural formality rather than a substantive safeguard. Third, community participation remains restricted, as local residents are often excluded from decision-making processes and lack access to environmental information. Collectively, these conditions transform AMDAL into a symbolic administrative requirement rather than an effective regulatory tool. The study concludes that strengthening institutions, insulating environmental governance from political interests, and empowering communities are essential to improving AMDAL enforcement and environmental protection in Indonesia’s extractive sectors.

References

Abdurrachman, H., Hamzani, A. I., & Mariyono, J. (2021). Environmental crime and law enforcement in Indonesia: some reflections on counterproductive approaches. Environmental Policy and Law, 51(6), 409-416. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-210024

Arif, M. S., Gunbeyaz, S. A., Kurt, R. E., & Supomo, H. (2025). Stakeholder perspectives on multipurpose shipyard integration in Indonesia: benefits, challenges, and implementation pathways. Sustainability, 17(18), 8368. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188368

Aurora, F. (2019). Institutional change and resource governance in hydrocarbon and mining industries in Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).

Azzahra, A. (2024). From Policy to Practice: Institutional Pathways Toward Environmental Justice in the Global South. Sinergi International Journal of Law, 2(4), 286-298. https://doi.org/10.61194/law.v2i4.720

Bebbington, D. H., & Bebbington, A. (2012). Post-what? Extractive industries, narratives of development, and socio-environmental disputes across the (ostensibly changing) Andean region. In New political spaces in Latin American natural resource governance (pp. 17-37). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137073723_2

Bersch, K., & Lotta, G. (2024). Political control and bureaucratic resistance: The case of environmental agencies in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 66(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2023.22

Butler, T., & McGovern, D. (2012). A conceptual model and IS framework for the design and adoption of environmental compliance management systems: For special issue on governance, risk and compliance in IS. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9197-5

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Regulatory agencies—The challenges of balancing agency autonomy and political control. Governance, 20(3), 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00368.x

Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Bisogno, M. (2022). Budget transparency and financial sustainability. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(6), 210-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2022-0025

Grama, B. (2022). Company-administered grievance processes for external stakeholders: A means for effective remedy, community relations, or private power?. Wis. Int'l LJ, 39, 71.

Hasibuan, O. P., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., & Sunitiyoso, Y. (2022). Illegal gold mining in Indonesia: structure and causes. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(1), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-11-2019-0964

Hou, X., Yang, J., & Hou, C. (2024). Can strengthening environmental justice promote carbon reduction? Evidence from environmental courts in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(46), 57081-57098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-31907-z

Irawan, E. (2021, June). Lake and the laws: An exploratory network analysis of legal provisions for lake management. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 789, No. 1, p. 012038). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/789/1/012038

Khalili, N. R., & Duecker, S. (2013). Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management system framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.044

Kubbe, I., &, M. (2025). Conclusion: Beyond Borders, Beyond Bribery—Rethinking the Terrain of Cross-Border Corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 00027642251394646. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642251394646

Malik, R. H. (2024). Stakeholder views on the uptake of sustainable and responsible nickel mining and processing supply chains for electric vehicles in Indonesia. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Maspul, K. A. (2025). Sacrificing Paradise: Indonesia’s Green Energy Ambitions and the Future of Raja Ampat. Journal of Environmental Economics and Sustainability, 2(3), 22-22. https://doi.org/10.47134/jees.v2i3.711

Rizal, K., & Idrus, A. (2024). GLOBAL CRITICAL MINERAL REVIEW AND CHALLENGES ON ITS EXPLORATION IN INDONESIA. Indonesian Mining Journal, 27(2), 97-123. https://doi.org/10.30556/imj.Vol27.No2.2024.1605

Salim, A., & Palullungan, L. (2021). The challenges of environmental law enforcement to implement SDGs in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 517-524.

Sari, R., & Muslim, M. (2023). Accountability and transparency in public sector accounting: A systematic review. Amkop Management Accounting Review (AMAR), 3(2), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.37531/amar.v3i2.1440

Short, J. L. (2021). The politics of regulatory enforcement and compliance: Theorizing and operationalizing political influences. Regulation & Governance, 15(3), 653-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12291

Spitz, K., & Husin, Y. (2009, October). The AMDAL process and the equator principles. In P Mining Indonesia 2009 Conf.: Unlocking Mineral Potential.

Splitter, V., Dobusch, L., von Krogh, G., Whittington, R., & Walgenbach, P. (2023). Openness as organizing principle: Introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 44(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221145595

Sunuhadi, D. N., Hilman, P. M., & Suseno, T. (2024). Availability of Indonesian nickel reserves and efforts to improve reserves resistance and its impact to economic growth. Mineral Economics, 37(3), https://doi.org/601-617. 10.1007/s13563-024-00443-0

Susilawati, D. (2022). Regulating the journey of timber: legality and sustainability governance in Indonesian wood value chains (Doctoral dissertation, The Australian National University (Australia)).

Tarigan, M. I., & Hafandi, R. (2024). Law diversities for climate change: legal pluralism and climate governance in Indonesia. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 14(3), 589-605.

Thabrew, L., Wiek, A., & Ries, R. (2009). Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.03.008

Wisnumurti, R. W. (2024). Authority Of Local Governments In Issuing Environmental Impact Assessment Permits. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 10(1), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v10i1.5934