Legal Protection for Consumers in Trading Transactions Through the Tiktok Marketplace

Authors

  • Marga Yogatama Faculty of Law, Universitas Boyolali
  • Muti Amanda Chairiyah Faculty of Law, Universitas Boyolali
  • Adi Sucipto Faculty of Law, Universitas Boyolali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v3i1.331

Keywords:

Consumer Protection, Social Commerce, Tiktok Marketplace, Digital Platforms, Electronic Transactions

Abstract

The rapid growth of social commerce platforms has transformed online trading practices and introduced new challenges for consumer protection law. TikTok Marketplace, as an integration of social media content and digital commerce, exemplifies this shift by blurring the boundaries between entertainment, advertising, and contractual transactions. This study aims to analyze the extent to which existing legal frameworks provide effective protection for consumers engaging in trading transactions through TikTok Marketplace. Using a qualitative research design with a case study approach, the study relies on secondary data derived from statutory regulations, platform policy documents, official reports, and scholarly literature. The analysis applies a descriptive-deductive method to assess consumer rights, the allocation of legal responsibilities among platforms, sellers, and content creators, and the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms. The findings indicate that while current consumer protection and electronic transaction laws establish basic normative safeguards, they are not fully responsive to the distinctive characteristics of social commerce. Gaps persist in responsibility allocation, transparency of promotional content, and enforcement mechanisms, particularly in platform-based dispute resolution. This study contributes to the literature on consumer protection and digital platform governance by offering a focused legal analysis of social commerce and highlighting the need for more adaptive and explicit regulatory approaches to protect consumers in evolving digital marketplaces.

References

Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping Internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labour. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140

Antoniou, A. (2021). Advertising regulation and transparency in influencers’ endorsements on social media. Communications Law-Journal of Computer, Media and Telecommunications Law, 26(4), 190-207.

Busch, C. (2019). Self-regulation and regulatory intermediation in the platform economy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 42(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9397-9

Chawla, N., & Kumar, B. (2022). E-commerce and consumer protection in India: the emerging trend. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 581-604.

Chen, J., & Liu, C. (2021). Regulating social commerce in Asia: Legal challenges and policy responses. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105530

Cooper, K. (2021). Influencers: not so fluent in disclosure compliance. Loy. LA Ent. L. Rev., 41, 77.

Crawford, G. S., Crémer, J., Dinielli, D., Fletcher, A., Heidhues, P., Luca, M., ... & Sinkinson, M. (2021). Consumer protection for online markets and large digital platforms. Policy discussion paper, (1).

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

European Commission. (2022). The Digital Services Act package. Publications Office of the European Union.

Faisal, S. (1990). Penelitian kualitatif: Dasar-dasar dan aplikasi. Yayasan Asih Asah Asuh.

Fletcher, A., Crawford, G. S., Crémer, J., Dinielli, D., Heidhues, P., Luca, M., ... & Sinkinson, M. (2023). Consumer protection for online markets and large digital platforms. Yale J. on Reg., 40, 875. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3923588

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.

Hargittai, E., Piper, A. M., & Morris, M. R. (2019). From internet access to internet skills. Social Issues and Policy Review, 13(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12055

Helberger, N., Lynskey, O., Micklitz, H. W., Rott, P., Sax, M., & Strycharz, J. (2021). EU consumer protection 2.0. Structural asymmetries in digital consumer markets. Joint Report from EUCP2. 0 Project BEUC.

Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2020). Governing online platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914

Howells, G., Ramsay, I., & Wilhelmsson, T. (2018). Consumer law and policy: Text and materials on regulating consumer markets (3rd ed.). Hart Publishing.

Lari-Williams, F. (2024). Managing the powers of digital platforms through platform law, contract law and consumer law (Doctoral dissertation, University of Antwerp).

Lim, X. J., Cheah, J. H., Waller, D. S., Ting, H., & Ng, S. I. (2022). What s-commerce implies? Journal of Business Research, 141, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.047

McConville, M., & Chui, W. H. (2017). Research methods for law (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Moleong, L. J. (1996). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nash, I. (2021). Cybersecurity in a post-data environment: Considerations on the regulation of code and the role of producer and consumer liability in smart devices. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 105529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105529

OECD. (2020). Consumer policy and fraud: Consumer issues in online and digital markets. OECD Publishing.

Pharmacista, G. (2024). Legal Responsibility of the Expedition Company for Consumer Losses Due to Loss of Goods in the Goods Delivery Service it Provides. Journal of Economics and Business (JECOMBI), 4(03), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.58471/jecombi.v4i03.86

Santoso, V. A. (2021). Legal Protection on E-Commerce Transactions: Problems and Challenges in Global Business. Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review, 1(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.15294/lsr.v1i2.50552

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Twigg-Flesner, C. (2016). Disruptive technology—Disrupted law?. Journal of Consumer Policy, 39(4), 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-016-9337-5

Wang, Y., Wang, S., & Lee, S. H. (2022). The rise of social commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 54, 101164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101164

Widijowati, D. (2023). Enhancing consumer protection in electronic commerce transactions. Research Horizon, 3(4), 283-290.

Widijowati, D. (2023). Enhancing consumer protection in electronic commerce transactions. Research Horizon, 3(4), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.3.4.2023.137

Widijowati, D., & Denysenko, S. (2023). Securing Consumer Rights: Ethical and Legal Measures against Advertisements that Violate Advertising Procedures. Lex Publica, 10(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.10.1.2023.28-42

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Zhang, M., & Lin, X. (2023). Social commerce and consumer protection challenges. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 57(2), 742–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12490

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23