Representation of Power in the Symbolism of Traditional Rituals: Cultural Anthropology Studies in Eastern Indonesia

Authors

  • Yuyu yusriani Department of Anthropology Education, Makassar State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37899/mjds.v2i3.201

Keywords:

Power , Symbolism , Traditional Rituals , Cultural Anthropology

Abstract

This study challenges the depiction of power in the symbolic structure of traditional rituals in Eastern Indonesia through the perspectives of cultural anthropology. Rituals are viewed not only as spiritual practices or practices embedded in past traditions but as symbolic arenas where power relations, social authority, and collective personality are enacted. In traditional societies, authority is often enshrined in sacral signs- such as relics, hymns, or celebrations- each with a hierarchical meaning that restates authority. The data collection was conducted using qualitative ethnographic approach, where participant observations and in-depth interviews with traditional rulers, ritual experts, and community members involved in the ceremonies were utilized to collect data. The analytic emphasis was on deriving the meaning of ritual symbols and comparing them to the social power structures that survive. The results reveal that rituals are used as a means of justifying power of traditional leaders, maintaining social stratifications, and acting as means of social control. Symbolic analysis discloses that power is not only a result of political or economic status but also of spiritual legitimacy passed down through generations. At the same time, the new presence of women and youth is an indicator of negotiated authority and changing significances. Finally, power in the Eastern Indonesian societies is developed through symbolic formation based on shared opinions, normative systems, and cultural reproduction.

References

Allasiw, D. I., Tanaka, T., Kudo, S., & Mino, T. (2023). Opportunities and limitations to social learning for sustainability: empirical insights from a participatory approach to community-based resource management in the Philippines. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 21(1), 2239075. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2023.2239075

Becker, D., & Bernecker, K. (2023). Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: Indulging in harmless pleasures can support self-regulation and foster cooperation. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x23000456

Bell, C. (1990). The ritual body and the dynamics of ritual power. Journal of ritual studies, 4(2), 299-313.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Structures, habitus, practices. In Practical sense (pp. 91–111). Stanford University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Farage, S. (1993). Power and the sacred: Symbols, rituals and dramatizations. The Pennsylvania State University.

Fogelin, L. (2007). The archaeology of religious ritual. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 36(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.ANTHRO.36.081406.094425

Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). Basic Books.

Hoskin, K. (1993). Education and the genesis of discipline: The unexpected reversal. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplines (pp. 271–304). University of Virginia Press.

Isro'iyah, L. (2025). Culture and Modern Indonesian Women: Navigating Tradition and Change. SIWAYANG Journal: Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Pariwisata, Kebudayaan, dan Antropologi, 4(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.54443/siwayang.v4i1.2693

Kale, S. H. (2004). Spirituality, religion, and globalization. Journal of macromarketing, 24(2), 92-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0276146704269296

Kay, A. (2024). The changing traditions of Islamic public administration: observing processes of collision, absorption and adaptation. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 46(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2275283

Keane, W. (1997). Religious language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.47

Keane, W. (2023). Signs of recognition: powers and hazards of representation in an Indonesian society. Univ of California Press.

Letlora, Y. A., Rumra, F., & Bandjar, A. (2024). Ina Nara Amayali as cultural representation: Analysis of symbolism and social structure in traditional marriage rituals of the Wetang Indigenous community. Populis: Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 18(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.37892/jsp.v18i2.987

Loveman, M. (2005). The modern state and the primitive accumulation of symbolic power. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1651-1683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/428688

Lynch, M., Gunning, J., & Valbjørn, M. (2024). Changing Warscapes, Changing Islamists? Religion, Organization, Strategic Context and New Approaches to Armed Islamist Insurgencies. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2024.2398668

May, S., Wilson, E. K., Baumgart-Ochse, C., & Sheikh, F. (2014). The religious as political and the political as religious: Globalisation, post-secularism and the shifting boundaries of the sacred. Politics, religion & ideology, 15(3), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2014.948526

Miller, N. N. (1968). The political survival of traditional leadership. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 6(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00017146

Nilan, P., & Maunati, Y. (2025). Gender: New Paradigms of Equity and Identity in Southeast Asia. In Decolonising Social Science Research in Southeast Asia: New Ways of Knowing (pp. 33-57). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4624-1_2

Obadia, L. (2014). Globalisation and new geographies of religion: new regimes in the movement, circulation, and territoriality of cults and beliefs. International social science journal, 63(209-210), 147-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/issj.12034

Otubanjo, T. T., & Balogun, G. A. (2025). Sacred Influence, Secular Realms: The Politicisation of Religion in Nigeria. KONTAGORA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2(3), 112-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15867577

Parker, C. (2024). Religious and spiritual diversity in multiple modernities: a decolonial perspective focusing on peripheral religious expressions. Religions, 15(6), 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15060726

Rai, S. M. (2014). Performance and politics: Ceremony and ritual in Parliament1. In The grammar of politics and performance (pp. 148-161). Routledge.

Rusdi, R., Miharja, H. A., & Adila, H. A. (2025). Sacred Stones and Social Identity: The Cultural Persistence and Transformation of Precious Stone Traditions in Biringala Village, South Sulawesi. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 7(1), 185-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/issj.v7i1.16369

Sasaki, I., & Baba, S. (2024). Shades of cultural marginalization: Cultural survival and autonomy processes. Organization Theory, 5(1), 26317877231221552.

Schein, L. (1999). Performing modernity. Cultural Anthropology, 14(3), 361-395. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1999.14.3.361

Shamhuna, A. A. (2025). The Political Symbols and the Exercise of Traditional Authority in Dagbon Chieftaincy. LECTURES: Journal of Islamic and Education Studies, 4(2), 170-193. https://doi.org/10.58355/lectures.v4i2.146

Shamhuna, A. A. (2025). The Political Symbols and the Exercise of Traditional Authority in Dagbon Chieftaincy. LECTURES: Journal of Islamic and Education Studies, 4(2), 170-193. https://doi.org/10.58355/lectures.v4i2.146

Turner, R. H. (1969). The public perception of protest. American Sociological Review, 34(6), 815–831. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092302

Yuetong, Z., & Jianxing, B. (2024). The Transgressive Individual in Foucault’s Rights-Punishment Theory-A Record of Self-Resistant Subjectivity in China. Deviant Behavior, 45(9), 1265-1278. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/01639625.2023.2291048

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30