Urban Informal Settlements and Access to Public Services: A Case Study of Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjds.v2i4.226Keywords:
Informal Settlements, Public Services, SurabayaAbstract
Urban informal settlements remain one of the most pressing challenges for rapidly growing cities in the Global South, where the expansion of population is not always matched by equitable access to essential services. This study examines the conditions of informal settlements in Surabaya, Indonesia, focusing on how residents access basic public services such as water, sanitation, health care, education, and transportation. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining household surveys, in-depth interviews, and spatial mapping to capture both quantitative and qualitative dimensions of service provision. The findings reveal persistent inequalities: while electricity and basic education are relatively more accessible due to government programs, services such as clean water, sanitation, and affordable health care remain limited and unevenly distributed. Spatial analysis further shows that most public facilities are concentrated in formal neighborhoods, forcing informal settlement residents to rely on costly or unsafe alternatives. Households also bear a disproportionately high financial burden, as a large share of their income is spent on transportation and education, reinforcing cycles of poverty. Despite these constraints, communities demonstrate resilience through collective strategies, including neighborhood cooperation and partnerships with NGOs, although these measures remain insufficient to address structural exclusion. The study underscores the importance of inclusive urban governance that recognizes informal settlements as integral to the city, calling for targeted investments and policies that promote equity in service delivery.
References
Arieffiani, D., & Ekowanti, M. R. L. (2024). Evaluating local government policy innovations: A case study of Surabaya’s efforts in combating stunting and enhancing public health services quality. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.1-20
Bayu Anindito, D., Indriansyah, N. R., Maula, F. K., & Akbar, R. (2019). A quantitative perspective on kampung kota: Elaborating definition and variables of Indonesian informal settlements (Case study: Kelurahan Tamansari, Bandung City). International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.7.2_53
Dewi, S., & Santoso, J. (2022). Health access and social exclusion in Indonesian informal settlements. Journal of Urban Health, 99(2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-021-00578-3
Dynamic policy network of urban slum settlement collaboration: A case study of Pekanbaru, Riau Province, Indonesia. (2023). International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 11(4), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.11.4.167
Firman, T. (2016). The urbanization of poverty in Indonesia: Trends, processes, and challenges. Habitat International, 54, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.020
Hospital utilization in Indonesia in 2018: Do urban–rural disparities exist? (2022). BMC Health Services Research, 22, 491. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07896-5
Informal City: Paradigma baru menuju kota inklusif dan berkelanjutan. (2024). RUANG: Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan, 11(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.24843/JRS.2024.v11.i02.p02
Kooy, M., & Bakker, K. (2008). Splintered networks: The colonial and contemporary waters of Jakarta. Geoforum, 39(6), 1843–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.012
Kusno, A. (2013). After the New Order: Space, politics and Jakarta. University of Hawai‘i Press.
Nguyen, T. T., Tran, P., & Pham, T. (2020). Urban informality and access to services in Southeast Asia: A comparative perspective. Cities, 105, 102812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102812
Nicoletti, L., Sirenko, M., & Verma, T. (2022). Disadvantaged communities have lower access to urban infrastructure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.13784. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13784
Overcoming slum settlements: Lesson learned from implementation of uninhabitable house social rehabilitation program in Surabaya. (n.d.). DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 19(1). https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/dia/article/view/4619
Prayitno, B., Prakoso, A. A., Hantono, D., Butudoka, Z., & Yulisaksono, D. (2021). Aspects of public space in the informal economic spaces at low-cost apartment building (Rusunawa) in Surabaya. Idealog: Ide dan Dialog Desain Indonesia, 6(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.25124/idealog.v6i1.3897
Rigg, J., Salamanca, A., & Thompson, E. C. (2021). Mobility poverty in Southeast Asian cities: Inequality and everyday transport. Urban Studies, 58(13), 2734–2751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020957199
Setiawan, B., & Nurbaya, A. (2020). Education and inequality in Indonesian informal settlements. International Journal of Educational Development, 74, 102167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102167
Siagian, L. D. T. (2021). Penilaian livability pada permukiman yang dikembangkan oleh informal land subdividers di Kecamatan Gunung Anyar Kota Surabaya [Undergraduate thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember]. https://repository.its.ac.id/86506/
Silver, C. (2008). Planning the megacity: Jakarta in the twentieth century. Routledge.
Suhartini, N., & Jones, P. (2023). Beyond the informal: Understanding self-organized kampungs in Indonesia. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22239-9
UN-Habitat. (2020). World Cities Report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. UN-Habitat.
World Resources Institute. (n.d.). Surabaya: The legacy of participatory upgrading of informal settlements. https://www.wri.org/research/surabaya-legacy-participatory-upgrading-informal-settlements
Wulandari, R. D., & Laksono, A. D. (2019). Urban-rural disparity: The utilization of primary healthcare centers among elderly in East Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia, 7(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v7i2.2019.147-154
