The Influence of Digital Platforms on Social Networks and Collective Action among Urban Youth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjds.v3i1.333Keywords:
Digital Platforms, Urban Youth, Social Networks, Collective Action, Digital Sociology, Civic EngagementAbstract
Digital platforms have become central to the social lives of urban youth, reshaping how social networks are formed and how collective action emerges in contemporary cities. This study aims to analyze the influence of digital platforms on social networks and collective action among urban youth, with a particular focus on the relational mechanisms that connect digital engagement to collective participation. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed, collecting data from urban youth and analyzing the relationships between digital platform use, social network characteristics, and collective action using regression and mediation analysis. The results reveal that digital platform use is positively associated with larger, more diverse, and more connected social networks. These network characteristics significantly increase youth participation in collective action, both online and offline. Moreover, social networks partially mediate the relationship between digital platform use and collective action, indicating that digital platforms facilitate collective engagement primarily by strengthening relational structures rather than acting as direct mobilizing forces. The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of digitally mediated collective action by highlighting the central role of social networks in urban youth participation. The study underscores the importance of network diversity and connectedness for fostering inclusive and sustainable collective action in digitally mediated urban environments.
References
Ali, M. N. (2025). Digital Activism and Collective Mobilization: A Narrative Review of Social Identity, Group Efficacy, and the SIMCA Framework. Sinergi International Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.61194/psychology.v3i1.691
Alnemr, N. (2025). Deliberative democracy in an algorithmic society: Harms, contestations and deliberative capacity in the digital public sphere. Democratization, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2025.2522920
Antonucci, M. C., Sorice, M., & Volterrani, A. (2022). Social and digital vulnerabilities: The role of participatory processes in the reconfiguration of urban and digital space. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 970958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.970958
Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bernroider, E. W., Harindranath, G., & Kamel, S. (2022). From connective actions in social movements to offline collective actions: an individual level perspective. Information Technology & People, 35(8), 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2020-0556
Bühler, M. M., Calzada, I., Cane, I., Jelinek, T., Kapoor, A., Mannan, M., & Zhu, J. (2023). Unlocking the power of digital commons: Data cooperatives as a pathway for data sovereign, innovative and equitable digital communities. Digital, 3(3), 146–171. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital3030011
Chan, G. H. (2022). The social capital accumulation in the contemporary era. Internet Research, 32(6), 1930-1951. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2020-0711
Collar, A. (2022). Strong ties, social networks, and the diffusion of new ideas: Who do you trust? In Networks and the spread of ideas in the past (pp. 1–28). Routledge.
Durga, D. D. (2025). Social Movements in the Digital Age: How Online Activism is Transforming Civic Engagement. Scholar's Digest: Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies, 1(1), 99-120.
Engert, M., Evers, J., Hein, A., & Krcmar, H. (2023). Sustaining complementor engagement in digital platform ecosystems: Antecedents, behaviours and engagement trajectories. Information Systems Journal, 33(5), 1151-1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12438
Flanagan, C., Gallay, E., & Pykett, A. (2022). Urban youth and the environmental commons: Rejuvenating civic engagement through civic science. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(6), 692–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1994132
Gawer, A. (2022). Digital platforms and ecosystems: Remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation, 24(1), 110–124.
Gearin, E., & Hurt, C. S. (2024). Making space: a new way for community engagement in the urban planning process. Sustainability, 16(5), 2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052039
Guo, Z., Chen, X., Zhang, H., Wong, C. U. I., Zheng, H., Yang, C., & Solianyk, A. (2025). VR Reading Revolution: Decoding User Intentions Through Task-Technology Fit and Emotional Resonance. Applied Sciences, 15(13), 6955. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15136955
Harracá, M., Castelló, I., & Gawer, A. (2023). How digital platforms organize immaturity: A sociosymbolic framework of platform power. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(3), 440–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.40
Harracá, M., Castelló, I., & Gawer, A. (2023). How digital platforms organize immaturity: A sociosymbolic framework of platform power. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(3), 440-472. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.40
Hasan, M., & Paul, A. (2025). The role of social media in political mobilization: a systematic review. Business & Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.25163/business.3110221
Ihlebæk, K. A., & Sundet, V. S. (2023). Global platforms and asymmetrical power: Industry dynamics and opportunities for policy change. New Media & Society, 25(8), 2183–2200. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211029662
Karataş, S., Batur, M., & Aydoğan, Ş. Ö. (2026). The Paradox of Digital Activism in the Age of the Environmental Crisis: The Case of X (Twitter) Through the Lens of Slacktivism. Romaya Journal, (1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19023198
Kartika, R., Puspita, M., & Susanto, J. (2025). Social media influence on youth identity formation in urban communities. Journal Social Humanity Perspective, 3(3), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.71435/661333
Kasimov, A. (2024). Decentralized hate: Sustained connective action in online far-right community. In Mobilizing for and against the far-right (pp. 79–97). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2204427
Leong, C., Lin, S., Tan, F., & Yu, J. (2024). Coordination in a digital platform organization. Information Systems Research, 35(1), 363-393. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.1226
Lewis, K. (2024). Digital networks: Elements of a theoretical framework. Social Networks, 77, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.12.002
Lorenzini, J., & Forno, F. (2022). Political consumerism and lifestyle activism. In The Oxford handbook of political participation (pp. 417–434). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198861126.013.25
Luo, Y. (2022). New connectivity in the fragmented world. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(5), 962. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00530-w
Oetzel, J. G., Boursaw, B., Magarati, M., Dickson, E., Sanchez-Youngman, S., Morales, L., ... & Wallerstein, N. (2022). Exploring theoretical mechanisms of community-engaged research: a multilevel cross-sectional national study of structural and relational practices in community-academic partnerships. International journal for equity in health, 21(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01663-y
Phan, V., & Kloos, B. (2023). Examining civic engagement in ethnic minority youth populations: A literature review and concept analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(1–2), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12643
Quynh, N. D., & Thanh, N. N. (2025). How digital platforms influence young people's participation in governance and civic activities: evidence in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 326-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2024.2447991
Rajavel, N. (2026). Education for Digital Citizenship and Civic. Youth Civic Engagement and Political Participation in Digital Spaces, 23. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-5581-8.ch002
Ramjit, D. M. (2025). Citizen empowerment in the digital era: Redefining administrative legitimacy and power dynamics. Public Administration and Development, 45(3), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70002
Ranaivoson, H. R., & Domazetovikj, N. (2023). Platforms and exposure diversity: towards a framework to assess policies to promote exposure diversity. Media and Communication, 11(2), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6401
Reisdorf, B. C., Fernandez, L., Hampton, K. N., Shin, I., & Dutton, W. H. (2022). Mobile phones will not eliminate digital and social divides: How variation in internet activities mediates the relationship between type of internet access and local social capital in Detroit. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2), 288-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320909446
Sormani, E., & Rossano-Rivero, S. (2023). Facilitating academic engagement with society: A bonding social capital approach to self-determination. Triple Helix, 9(3), 296-324. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10036
Uğur, S. İ. N. E. M., Yiğit Açıkgöz, F. A. T. M. A., Çelik, H., Arık, M., Kayakuş, M., Güdekli, İ. S. M. A. İ. L., ... & Çizmeli, D. (2025). Violence against women in the context of anger and claiming rights: An X analysis. Vivat Academia, 158. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2025.158.e1621
Waldherr, A., Stoltenberg, D., Maier, D., Keinert, A., & Pfetsch, B. (2024). Translocal networked public spheres: Spatial arrangements of metropolitan Twitter. new media & society, 26(11), 6636-6657. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231156579
