The Influence of Digital Platforms on Social Networks and Collective Action among Urban Youth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjds.v3i1.333Keywords:
Digital Platforms, Urban Youth, Social Networks, Collective Action, Digital Sociology, Civic EngagementAbstract
Digital platforms have become central to the social lives of urban youth, reshaping how social networks are formed and how collective action emerges in contemporary cities. This study aims to analyze the influence of digital platforms on social networks and collective action among urban youth, with a particular focus on the relational mechanisms that connect digital engagement to collective participation. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed, collecting data from urban youth and analyzing the relationships between digital platform use, social network characteristics, and collective action using regression and mediation analysis. The results reveal that digital platform use is positively associated with larger, more diverse, and more connected social networks. These network characteristics significantly increase youth participation in collective action, both online and offline. Moreover, social networks partially mediate the relationship between digital platform use and collective action, indicating that digital platforms facilitate collective engagement primarily by strengthening relational structures rather than acting as direct mobilizing forces. The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of digitally mediated collective action by highlighting the central role of social networks in urban youth participation. The study underscores the importance of network diversity and connectedness for fostering inclusive and sustainable collective action in digitally mediated urban environments.
References
Alnemr, N. (2025). Deliberative democracy in an algorithmic society: Harms, contestations and deliberative capacity in the digital public sphere. Democratization, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2025.2522920
Antonucci, M. C., Sorice, M., & Volterrani, A. (2022). Social and digital vulnerabilities: The role of participatory processes in the reconfiguration of urban and digital space. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 970958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.970958
Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bühler, M. M., Calzada, I., Cane, I., Jelinek, T., Kapoor, A., Mannan, M., & Zhu, J. (2023). Unlocking the power of digital commons: Data cooperatives as a pathway for data sovereign, innovative and equitable digital communities. Digital, 3(3), 146–171. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital3030011
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Collar, A. (2022). Strong ties, social networks, and the diffusion of new ideas: Who do you trust? In Networks and the spread of ideas in the past (pp. 1–28). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Diani, M., & McAdam, D. (2003). Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford University Press.
Earl, J., Hunt, J., Garrett, R. K., & Dal, A. (2017). New technologies and social movements. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (2nd ed., pp. 355–366). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.013.20
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2018). The value of online surveys: A look back and a look ahead. Internet Research, 28(4), 854–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2018-0089
Flanagan, C., Gallay, E., & Pykett, A. (2022). Urban youth and the environmental commons: Rejuvenating civic engagement through civic science. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(6), 692–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1994132
Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Gawer, A. (2022). Digital platforms and ecosystems: Remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation, 24(1), 110–124.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Harracá, M., Castelló, I., & Gawer, A. (2023). How digital platforms organize immaturity: A sociosymbolic framework of platform power. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(3), 440–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.40
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Hodkinson, P. (2012). Youth cultures and the rest of life: Subcultures, post-subcultures and beyond. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ihlebæk, K. A., & Sundet, V. S. (2023). Global platforms and asymmetrical power: Industry dynamics and opportunities for policy change. New Media & Society, 25(8), 2183–2200. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211029662
Jasper, J. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015
Kasimov, A. (2024). Decentralized hate: Sustained connective action in online far-right community. In Mobilizing for and against the far-right (pp. 79–97). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2204427
Kartika, R., Puspita, M., & Susanto, J. (2025). Social media influence on youth identity formation in urban communities. Journal Social Humanity Perspective, 3(3), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.71435/661333
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press.
Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. A. (2014). The networked young citizen: Social media, political participation and civic engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871571
Lorenzini, J., & Forno, F. (2022). Political consumerism and lifestyle activism. In The Oxford handbook of political participation (pp. 417–434). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198861126.013.25
Marino, S. (2015). Making space, making place: Digital togetherness and the redefinition of migrant identities online. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115622479
Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. PublicAffairs.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Phan, V., & Kloos, B. (2023). Examining civic engagement in ethnic minority youth populations: A literature review and concept analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 71(1–2), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12643
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.
Ramjit, D. M. (2025). Citizen empowerment in the digital era: Redefining administrative legitimacy and power dynamics. Public Administration and Development, 45(3), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70002
Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., Van Deth, J. W., & García-Albacete, G. (2015). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
Tilly, C., & Wood, L. J. (2015). Social movements 1768–2012 (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2003). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121957286
