Analysis of Local Politics in the Regional Head Election of Buleleng Regency, Bali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjds.v1i1.4Keywords:
Buleleng Regency, Local Politics, Voter Preferences, Campaign StrategiesAbstract
The paper examines the workings of local politics during the Regional Head Election of Buleleng Regency, Bali with regards to the voter preference, institutional support, campaign approaches and political activity. A stratified random sampling, the quantitative research design and structured questionnaires were deployed to collect data analyzed by the descriptive and inferential statistical methods i.e., t-tests, regression analysis, ANOVA, and ANCOVA. Findings indicate that the expenditure of campaigns and the attractiveness of candidates play a great role in determining the preferences of the voters whereas satisfaction of the candidates very strongly relates with increased voter turnout. There was moderate levels of confidence in the local government especially among voters below the ages of 30 years and who were more educated and a feeling political cynicism was on the rise. Furthermore, the number of the youth who turned out to vote was very low and participation in other ways of engaging the civic life was low. These results bring to fore the essentiality of strategic campaign communique, institutional trust-building, and cult of engagement culturally embedded towards influencing electoral outcomes. This research can be used to comprehend the wider picture of subnational democratic practices and find some viable alternatives to promoting the quality of policies and inclusion characterizing local government in Indonesia.
References
Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00007
Aspinall, E. (2013). A nation in fragments: Patronage and neoliberalism in contemporary Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 45(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2013.758820
Banducci, S. A., & Karp, J. A. (2003). How elections change the way citizens view the political system: Campaigns, media effects and electoral outcomes in comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 443–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340300019X
Chamusca, P. (2023). Public policies for territorial cohesion and sustainability in Europe: an Overview. Sustainability, 15(8), 6890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086890
Coen, D., Katsaitis, A., & Vannoni, M. (2021). Business lobbying in the European Union. Oxford University Press.
Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992337
Fauzan, I., & Sudarmo, S. (2018). Local wisdom and democracy in Indonesia: Integration or confrontation? Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 22(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.29787
Fleming, A., O'Grady, A. P., Stitzlein, C., Ogilvy, S., Mendham, D., & Harrison, M. T. (2022). Improving acceptance of natural capital accounting in land use decision making: Barriers and opportunities. Ecological Economics, 200, 107510.
Hadiz, V. R. (2003). Power and politics in North Sumatra: The uncompleted reformasi. In E. Aspinall & G. Fealy (Eds.), Local power and politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation and democratisation (pp. 119–131). ISEAS Publishing.
Henley, D. (2012). The agrarian roots of Indonesian military politics. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(2), 254–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2012.657465
Hessevik, A. (2022). Network‐led advocacy for a green shipping transformation: A case study of governance networks in the Norwegian maritime sector. Regulation & Governance, 16(4), 1101-1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12386
Hidayat, S., & Antlöv, H. (2003). Decentralization and regional autonomy in Indonesia: Implementation and challenges. Southeast Asian Studies, 41(2), 20–44.
Kim, S., Kim, H., & Lee, H. (2018). The impact of trust on citizen participation in e-government: Empirical evidence from South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(3), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316658450
Kusio, T., & Fiore, M. (2022). Which stakeholders’ sector matters in rural development? That is the problem. Energies, 15(2), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020454
McCoy, J. L., & Somer, M. (2021). Political parties, elections, and pernicious polarization in the rise of illiberalism. In Routledge handbook of illiberalism (pp. 486-504). Routledge.
McLeod, R. H. (2010). Soeharto’s Indonesia: A better class of corruption. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 7(2), 99–112.
Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004264
Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions: Faith, culture or performance? In S. Pharr & R. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? (pp. 52–73). Princeton University Press.
Schulte Nordholt, H. (2011). Decentralization and democracy in Indonesia: Strengthening citizenship or regional elites? Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 42(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463411000101
Suryadinata, L. (2017). Indonesia’s population: Ethnicity and religion in a changing political landscape. ISEAS Publishing.
Suwarso, R. (2016). Indonesian democracy: the impact of electoral systems on political parties, 1999–2009 (Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University).
van Der Woerd, O., Wallenburg, I., van Der Scheer, W., & Bal, R. (2024). Regional network‐building for complexity: a region‐oriented policy response to increasing and varied demands for older person care in the Netherlands. Public Administration, 102(2), 461-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12931
Vel, J. A. (2008). Uma politics: An ethnography of democratization in West Sumba, Indonesia, 1986-2006 (p. 277). Brill.
