The Effectiveness of the Business Capital Assistance Program in Improving the Performance of MSMEs in Palu City

Authors

  • Nurul Amelia Malik Department of Accounting and Economics, Universitas Tadulako
  • Fahrul Kahfi Faculty of Economics, Universitas Fajar
  • Fey Armita Faculty of Economics, Universitas Fajar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37899/mjde.v3i1.329

Keywords:

Business Capital Assistance, MSME Performance Government Support Programs, Post-Disaster Economic Recovery

Abstract

Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) play a crucial role in local economic recovery, particularly in post-disaster regions. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Business Capital Assistance Program in improving MSME performance in Palu City, Indonesia. The study focuses on whether government-provided capital support contributes to improvements in business income, production or sales capacity, and operational continuity. A quantitative approach was applied using a cross-sectional explanatory research design. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to MSME owners who had received business capital assistance from the local government. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis to examine the relationship between capital assistance and MSME performance while controlling for business age and sectoral differences. The findings indicate that business capital assistance has a positive and statistically significant effect on MSME performance. Beneficiary enterprises experienced increased income, improved production or sales volume, and stronger operational stability after receiving capital support. The effects were more pronounced among MSMEs operating in trade and food-related sectors, suggesting that sectoral characteristics influence the effectiveness of financial assistance. Overall, the study concludes that business capital assistance is effective in supporting MSME recovery and short-term performance in Palu City, although complementary non-financial support is needed to enhance long-term sustainabilityMicro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) play a crucial role in local economic recovery, particularly in post-disaster regions. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Business Capital Assistance Program in improving MSME performance in Palu City, Indonesia. The study focuses on whether government-provided capital support contributes to improvements in business income, production or sales capacity, and operational continuity. A quantitative approach was applied using a cross-sectional explanatory research design. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to MSME owners who had received business capital assistance from the local government. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis to examine the relationship between capital assistance and MSME performance while controlling for business age and sectoral differences. The findings indicate that business capital assistance has a positive and statistically significant effect on MSME performance. Beneficiary enterprises experienced increased income, improved production or sales volume, and stronger operational stability after receiving capital support. The effects were more pronounced among MSMEs operating in trade and food-related sectors, suggesting that sectoral characteristics influence the effectiveness of financial assistance. Overall, the study concludes that business capital assistance is effective in supporting MSME recovery and short-term performance in Palu City, although complementary non-financial support is needed to enhance long-term sustainability.

References

Anderson, S. J., Chandy, R., & Zia, B. (2018). Pathways to profits: The impact of marketing versus finance skills on business performance. Management Science, 64(12), 5557–5577. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2920

Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2011). Small vs. young firms across the world: Contribution to employment, job creation, and growth. World Bank Economic Review, 25(3), 445–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhr002

Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2014). Do firms want to borrow more? Testing credit constraints using a directed lending program. Review of Economic Studies, 81(2), 572–607. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt046

Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2931–2943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.009

Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2008). Financing patterns around the world: Are small firms different? Journal of Financial Economics, 89(3), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.10.005

BNPB. (2019). Post-disaster needs assessment: Central Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami. National Disaster Management Authority of Indonesia.

Bruhn, M., & Zia, B. (2013). Stimulating managerial capital in emerging markets: The impact of business training for young entrepreneurs. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 5(2), 232–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2013.780090

Campos, F., Frese, M., Goldstein, M., Iacovone, L., Johnson, H., McKenzie, D., & Mensmann, M. (2017). Teaching personal initiative beats traditional training in boosting small business in West Africa. Science, 357(6357), 1287–1290. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan5329

Chakraborty, M. (2025). Resilience Study of MSMEs During the Lockdown Period. Swami Vivekananda University Press, 48-58. https://doi.org/10.65525/SVUP.9788197589423.2025.48-58.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050306

Grimm, M., Krüger, J., & Lay, J. (2016). Barriers to entry and returns to capital in informal activities: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Review of Income and Wealth, 62(4), 789–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12178

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Karlan, D., & Valdivia, M. (2011). Teaching entrepreneurship: Impact of business training on microfinance clients and institutions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00074

Karlan, D., Knight, R., & Udry, C. (2015). Consulting and capital experiments with microenterprise tailors in Ghana. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.005

McKenzie, D. (2021). Small business training to improve firm performance in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, 36(2), 189–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab002

McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2014). What are we learning from business training and entrepreneurship evaluations around the developing world? World Bank Research Observer, 29(1), 48–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkt007

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

OECD. (2017). Enhancing the contributions of SMEs in a global and digitalised economy. OECD Publishing.

Omang, M. O., & Zambo, F. A. (2025). Effect of Globalization on Economic Vulnerability in 142 Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-025-02664-2

Peters, V. (2025). How banks are impacted by and mediate the economic consequences of natural disasters and climate shocks: A review. De Economist, 173(1), 47-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-024-09441-7

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Hardy, D. (2015). Addressing poverty and inequality in the rural economy from a global perspective. Applied Geography, 61, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.02.005

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.

Sharma, A. K. (2022). Implications of policy initiatives for MSMES amid economic disruptions caused by COVID-19. Vikalpa, 47(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/02560909221078460

Sinha, K. J., Sinha, S., & Sinha, B. J. (2024). Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Enterprises (MSMEs): The significant role and challenges in Indonesia’s economy. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 20824. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.20824

Tambunan, T. (2019). Recent evidence of the development of micro, small and medium enterprises in Indonesia. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-018-0140-4

Tambunan, T. T. (2022). Fostering resilience through micro, small and medium enterprises: perspectives from Indonesia. Springer Nature.

Tambunan, T. T. (2023). The potential role of MSMEs in achieving SDGs in Indonesia. In Role of micro, small and medium enterprises in achieving SDGs: Perspectives from emerging economies (pp. 39-72). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4829-1_3

Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.

World Bank. (2020). Indonesia: Post-disaster economic recovery and resilience. World Bank Publications

Downloads

Published

2026-02-24