Implementation of the Literacy and Numeracy Habituation Program to Improve Students' Basic Competencies at Elementary School 1 Labuhan Haji

Authors

  • Mirajul Wathoni Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Hamzanwadi University
  • Muh Deni Siregar Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Hamzanwadi University
  • Novina Anjalina Nur Anisa Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Hamzanwadi University.
  • Fathimatuzzuhro Lathif Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Hamzanwadi University
  • Herlina Yanti Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Hamzanwadi University
  • Hikatun Fatmariza Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Education, Hamzanwadi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdl.v3i1.307

Keywords:

Implementation, Literacy, Numeracy, Basic Competence, Elementary School

Abstract

This research aims to describe the implementation of literacy and numeracy programs in improving the basic competencies of students at SD Negeri 1 Labuhan Haji. The research approach used is qualitative descriptive, focusing on the implementation of activities, teachers’ strategies, and the results seen in students’ basic abilities. Data collection techniques were carried out through observations, interviews with classroom teachers, and documentation of literacy and numeracy activities conducted at the school every Tuesday. The results showed that the Literacy and Numeracy Habituation Activity (Bias Litnum) at SD Negeri 1 Labuhan Haji was implemented regularly and systematically. This activity consists of shared reading, writing simple responses, and numeracy exercises based on everyday life contexts. Teachers play an active role in designing interesting activities that are appropriate to the students’ level of ability. The Bias Litnum program has been proven to improve students’ reading comprehension, logical thinking, and basic arithmetic skills. Support from the principal, teachers, and parents also strengthens the culture of literacy and numeracy within the school environment.

References

Aini, K., AR, M. M., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Growing Numeral Literacy Skills through Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics Based on Local Wisdom. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 12(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v12i1.67642

Asrifan, A., Widyaningrum, A., Ramli, R. B., Riyanti, R., & Sultan, S. (2025). Navigating the AI Era: Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills for Global Challenges. In Enhancing Classroom Instruction and Student Skills With AI (pp. 449-480). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4576-5.ch013

Carcary, M. (2011). Evidence analysis using CAQDAS: Insights from a qualitative researcher. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(1), pp10-24.

Cash, R. M. (2017). Advancing differentiation: Thinking and learning for the 21st century. Free Spirit Publishing.

Chaliha, A., Hajarika, M., Bhuyan, T., & Neog, R. (2024). Innovative Approaches to Information Literacy: Enhancing Skills in the Digital Age. Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.48165/bapas.2024.44.2.1

Díez-Palomar, J., Ramis-Salas, M., Močnik, I., Simonič, M., & Hoogland, K. (2023, November). Challenges for numeracy awareness in the 21st century: making visible the invisible. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 8, p. 1295781). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1295781

Fitria, N., & Kurniawan, H. (2022). Peran guru dalam penguatan literasi dan numerasi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 7(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v8i4.54393

Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child development perspectives, 3(1), 30-37. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x

Gasson, S. (2004). Rigor in grounded theory research: An interpretive perspective on generating theory from qualitative field studies. In The handbook of information systems research (pp. 79-102). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-144-5.ch006

Halabieh, H., Hawkins, S., Bernstein, A. E., Lewkowict, S., Unaldi Kamel, B., Fleming, L., & Levitin, D. (2022). The future of higher education: Identifying current educational problems and proposed solutions. Education Sciences, 12(12), 888. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120888

Hapsarini, D. R., Erliana, C. I., Irwansyah, D., & Abdullah, D. (2023). Analyzing strategies for strengthening literacy competence at the junior high school level among school teams at the district and city levels in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 2(3), 561-581.

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2022). PIRLS 2021 international results in reading. IEA.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Panduan gerakan literasi nasional. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2021). Panduan implementasi literasi dan numerasi di sekolah dasar. Direktorat Sekolah Dasar.

Kihwele, J. E., & Mkomwa, J. (2023). Promoting students’ interest and achievement in mathematics through “King and Queen of Mathematics” initiative. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 16(1), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2021-0083

Megawati, L. A., & Sutarto, H. (2021). Analysis numeracy literacy skills in terms of standardized math problem on a minimum competency assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 155-165.

Morgan, D. L., & Nica, A. (2020). Iterative thematic inquiry: A new method for analyzing qualitative data. International journal of qualitative methods, 19, 1609406920955118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920955118

Naini, I., & Ulya, R. H. (2025). Reasoning Patterns and Sentence Construction Errors in Students’ Scholarly Articles: A Content Analysis of Academic Writing in Padang City. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.7447

Nasrullah, R., Laksono, K., Prayogi, A., Parmin, P., & Inayatillah, F. (2024). Establishing Literacy Foundations: Policies and Interventions for Indonesia's Future Excellence. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, 10(3), 1219-1230. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i3.11011

Niklas, F., Cohrssen, C., & Tayler, C. (2016). Parents supporting learning: A non-intensive intervention supporting literacy and numeracy in the home learning environment. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(2), 121-142. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/09669760.2016.1155147

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.

Panda, S., & Kaur, N. (2024). Empowered minds: Navigating digital seas with emerging information literacy framework. In Examining information literacy in academic libraries (pp. 48-82). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1143-1.ch004

Pratiwi, R. D. (2021). Implementasi gerakan literasi sekolah dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir logis siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(2), 267–278

Roche, A., Gervasoni, A., & Kalogeropoulos, P. (2023). Factors that promote interest and engagement in learning mathematics for low-achieving primary students across three learning settings. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(3), 525-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00402-w

Selman, S. B., & Dilworth‐Bart, J. E. (2024). Routines and child development: A systematic review. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 16(2), 272-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12549

Snodgrass, J. G., Clements, K. R., Nixon, W. C., Ortega, C., Lauth, S., & Anderson, M. (2020). An iterative approach to qualitative data analysis: Using theme, cultural models, and content analyses to discover and confirm a grounded theory of how gaming inculcates resilience. Field Methods, 32(4), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X20939749?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle

Sthapak, S., & Sawlani, R. (2024). Inclusive and equitable literacy and numeracy practices at foundational stage: global and comparative perspective. ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.2873

Sujatha, S., & Vinayakan, K. (2023). Integrating math and real-world applications: A review of practical approaches to teaching. International Journal of Computational Research and Development, 8(2), 55-60.

Taye, T., & Mengesha, M. (2024). Identifying and analyzing common English writing challenges among regular undergraduate students. Heliyon, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36876

Terrell, P., & Watson, M. (2018). Laying a firm foundation: Embedding evidence-based emergent literacy practices into early intervention and preschool environments. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 49(2), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_lshss-17-0053

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. Ascd.

Zhang, C., & Bingham, G. E. (2019). Promoting high-leverage writing instruction through an early childhood classroom daily routine (WPI): A professional development model of early writing skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 49, 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.06.003

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27