Comprehensive Review Of Organizational Design And Structure

Authors

  • Amar Mutiara Ahsin Manikam Student of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Semarang PGRI University
  • Tyas Ayu Septi Astuti Student of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Semarang PGRI University
  • Mila Dyah Nur Student of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Semarang PGRI University
  • Rizska Nur Halimah Student of Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Semarang PGRI University
  • Rauly Sijabat Supervisor, Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Semarang PGRI University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdm.v2i3.193

Keywords:

Organizational Structure, Organizational Design, Open Systems, Differentiation, Integration

Abstract

Organizational structure and design are the main foundations in carrying out activities and achieving organizational goals effectively. Organizational structure regulates the formal relationship between tasks and authorities, while organizational design represents how the structure is formed and adjusted to the internal and external needs of the organization. In a dynamic era, organizations are required to adapt through an open system approach that prioritizes interaction with the environment. This study examines key elements in organizational structure such as work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, span of control, centralization-decentralization, and formalization. In addition, factors that influence organizational design-including strategy, scale, technology, and environment-are also analyzed. Various structural models such as simple, functional, product, matrix, and network structures are explained along with their advantages and challenges. Understanding the theory of organizational structure and culture enriches the perspective on how organizational design plays a role in supporting performance and adaptation amidst rapid environmental changes. This study provides a theoretical and practical basis for the development of adaptive and effective organizational structures.

References

Agasisti, T., & Bowers, A. J. (2017). Data analytics and decision making in education: towards the educational data scientist as a key actor in schools and higher education institutions. In Handbook of contemporary education economics (pp. 184-210). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785369070.00014

Baktheer, A., Goralski, C., Hegger, J., & Chudoba, R. (2024). Stress configuration‐based classification of current research on fatigue of reinforced and prestressed concrete. Structural Concrete, 25(3), 1765-1781. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202300667

Berglund-Snodgrass, L., Fred, M., & Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2023). In-between stability and adaptability: Making sense of innovation platforms. disP-The Planning Review, 59(2), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2023.2257486

Bidwell, C. E. (1965). Serbo-Croatian Syntax. Language, 41(2), 238-259.

Blankenship, L. V., & Miles, R. E. (1968). Organizational structure and managerial decision behavior. Administrative science quarterly, 106-120. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/2391263

Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2022). Policy design for policy coordination. In Research handbook of policy design (pp. 351-370). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106606.00032

Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.

Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational policy, 19(3), 476-509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143

Daniels, R. J., & Trebilcock, M. J. (2013). Rethinking the welfare state: Government by voucher. Routledge.

Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Management in education, 30(4), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616665938

Dobbie, W., & Fryer Jr, R. G. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children's Zone. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 158-187. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.3.158

Dzebo, A., Shawoo, Z., & Browne, K. (2025). Does Policy Coherence Make National Implementation of Global Sustainability Agendas More Successful?. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-111523-102337

Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 3, 383-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00008-9

Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2017). Making sense of school leaders’ sense-making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 682-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216628536

Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of management review, 23(3), 531-546. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/259293

Kaur, H., Reddy, K. K., Reddy, M. K., & Hanafiah, M. M. (2025). Collaborative approaches to navigating complex challenges and adapting to a dynamically changing world. In Integration of AI, Quantum Computing, and Semiconductor Technology (pp. 209-234). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7076-6.ch010

Konopaske, R., Ivancevich, J. M., & Matteson, M. T. (2023). Organizational behavior and management. McGraw Hill.

Kornberger, M. (2017). The visible hand and the crowd: Analyzing organization design in distributed innovation systems. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016648499

Leso, B. H., Cortimiglia, M. N., & Ghezzi, A. (2023). The contribution of organizational culture, structure, and leadership factors in the digital transformation of SMEs: a mixed-methods approach. Cognition, Technology & Work, 25(1), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00714-2

Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American sociological review, 1(6), 894-904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615

Miceli, A., Hagen, B., Riccardi, M. P., Sotti, F., & Settembre-Blundo, D. (2021). Thriving, not just surviving in changing times: How sustainability, agility and digitalization intertwine with organizational resilience. Sustainability, 13(4), 2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042052

Mielcarek, P. (2024). Strategic Coherence and Company Performance: Research Results. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 1003(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.15678/KREM.2024.1003.0105

Neumerski, C. M., & Cohen, D. K. (2019). The heart of the matter: How reforms unsettle organizational identity. Educational Policy, 33(6), 882-915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819866918

Park, J., Yang, W., Jung, S., Lee, H., Hong, J., Lee, Y., & Kim, S. (2024). Assessment of energy self-sufficiency of a smart farm through integrated modeling of air-source heat pumps and solar power generation. Applied Energy, 367, 123398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123398

Patterson, O. (2014). Making sense of culture. Annual review of sociology, 40(1), 1-30. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043123

Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2019). Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative science quarterly, 64(1), 124-170. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0001839218759646

Pihlajamaa, M. (2023). What does it mean to be open? A typology of inbound open innovation strategies and their dynamic capability requirements. Innovation, 25(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1907192

Swidler, S. (1986). A reexamination of liquor price and consumption differences between public and private ownership states: Comment. Southern Economic Journal, 259-264.

van Ittersum, M. K., Alimagham, S., Silva, J. V., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Baijukya, F. P., Bala, A., ... & van Loon, M. P. (2025). Prospects for cereal self-sufficiency in sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(24), e2423669122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2423669122

Vyas, A. (2025). Revolutionizing Risk: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Financial Risk Management, Forecasting, and Global Implementation. Forecasting, and Global Implementation (April 21, 2025). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5224657

Weber, D. (1978). CH3NH3PbX3, ein Pb (II)-system mit kubischer perowskitstruktur/CH3NH3PbX3, a Pb (II)-system with cubic perovskite structure. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung B, 33(12), 1443-1445. https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-1978-1214

Weichbrodt, J., & Grote, G. (2010, June). Rules and Routines in Organizations: a review and extension. In Fourth International Conference on Organizational Routines. Nice/France (pp. 1-35).

Downloads

Published

2025-10-02

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Maroon Journal De Management:

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Maroon Journal De Management

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal provides direct open access to it's content on the principle that research is freely available to the public supporting a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published by Open Access will soon and forever be free for everyone to read and download. The license options defined for this journal are Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)