Virtual Learning Environments and Digital Learning Satisfaction among Generation Z Students

Authors

  • Hartina Marawiah Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Nadia Safitri Mahendra Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Kevin Adrian Wijaya Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdl.v3i2.374

Keywords:

Digital Learning Satisfaction, E-Learning, Generation Z, Higher Education, Learning Engagement, System Usability, Virtual Learning Environments

Abstract

This study examines the influence of virtual learning environments on digital learning satisfaction among Generation Z students in higher education. The research employed a quantitative approach using a cross-sectional survey involving 320 undergraduate students from several Indonesian universities implementing online and hybrid learning systems. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis to evaluate the influence of system usability, interaction quality, and learning engagement on digital learning satisfaction. The findings reveal that all variables significantly influence students’ satisfaction, with system usability emerging as the strongest predictor. The study demonstrates that accessible platforms, effective communication, and active student participation are essential components of satisfying digital learning experiences. The findings contribute theoretically to digital learning literature and practically provide strategic insights for universities in designing more adaptive, interactive, and student-centered virtual learning environments.

References

Ahmadi, G., Mohammadi, A., Asadzandi, S., Shah, M., & Mojtahedzadeh, R. (2023). What are the indicators of student engagement in learning management systems? a systematized review of the literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6453

Ahoto, A. T., Mbaye, M. B., Anyigbah, E., Ahoto, A. T., Mbaye, M. B., & Anyigbah, E. (2022). The impacts of learner-instructor interaction, learner-learner, learner-content interaction, internet self-efficacy and self-regulated learning on satisfaction of online education of African medical students. Open Access Library Journal, 9(9), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109202

Alania-Contreras, R. D., Ruiz-Aquino, M., Alvarez-Risco, A., Condori-Apaza, M., Chanca-Flores, A., Fabián-Arias, E., ... & Yáñez, J. A. (2024). Evolving attitudes toward online education in Peruvian university students: A quantitative approach. Heliyon, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30566

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Alruthaya, A., Nguyen, T. T., & Lokuge, S. (2021). The application of digital technology and the learning characteristics of Generation Z in higher education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.05991. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.05991

Althubaiti, A. (2023). Sample size determination: A practical guide for health researchers. Journal of general and family medicine, 24(2), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.600

Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2024). An evaluation of the impact of digital technology innovations on students’ learning: Participatory research using a student-centred approach. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(1), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09619-5

Besser, A., Flett, G. L., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2022). Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Understanding the challenges for students. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 8(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000198

Cain, C. C., Morgan Bryant, A., Buskey, C. D., & Meyers Ferguson, Y. (2022). Generation Z, learning preferences, and technology: An academic technology framework based on enterprise architecture. The Journal of the Southern Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17705/3JSIS.00019

Curelaru, M., Curelaru, V., & Cristea, M. (2022). Students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative approach. Sustainability, 14(13), 8138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138138

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Eli-Chukwu, N. C., Igbokwe, I. C., Ifebude, B., Nmadu, D., Iguodala, W., Uma, U., ... & Akudo, F. U. (2023). Challenges confronting e-learning in higher education institutions in Nigeria amid Covid-19. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(1), 238-253. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2021-0346

Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., A Parris, M., & Kashi, K. (2022). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83(2), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5

Gao, F., Wang, C., Xie, H., & Hong, J. (2024). Social interaction and online learning efficiency for middle school students: The mediating role of social presence and learning engagement. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100896

Hammad, H. S. (2025). Teaching the digital natives: Examining the learning needs and preferences of Gen Z learners in higher education. Transcultural Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 214-242. https://doi.org/10.21608/tjhss.2025.346098.1303

Hujah, I., Yusuf, F. A., Mutoharoh, M., & Maarif, M. (2025). Digital transformation in learning: A systematic review of digital technology utilization to enhance student-centered learning effectiveness. Southeast Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(2 (SI)), 56-64.

Idkhan, A. M., & Idris, M. M. R. (2023). The impact of user satisfaction in the use of e-learning systems in higher education: A CB-SEM approach. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 5(3), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v5i3.91

Izah, S. C., Sylva, L., & Hait, M. (2023). Cronbach's alpha: A cornerstone in ensuring reliability and validity in environmental health assessment. ES Energy and Environment, 23, 1057. http://dx.doi.org/10.30919/esee1057

Koseda, E., Reeve, C., Fascia, M., McIntosh, B., & Cohen, I. (2024). Globalisation, education, policy, and curricula issues: Education 4.0: Digital disruption and innovative solutions as pedagogical drivers in higher education. In Fourth international handbook of globalisation, education and policy research (pp. 541-584). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67667-3_30

Kulaylat, A. N., Tran, L., Kulaylat, A. S., & Hollenbeak, C. S. (2023). Regression analysis. In Translational surgery (pp. 157-163). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90300-4.00087-2

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., Schroder, K. E. E., & Kuo, Y. T. (2014). A case study of integrating interwise: Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and satisfaction in synchronous online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1664

Kyrousi, A. G., Tzoumaka, E., & Leivadi, S. (2022). Business employability for late millennials: exploring the perceptions of generation Z students and generation X faculty. Management Research Review, 45(5), 664-683. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-04-2021-0328

Lichy, J., Dutot, V., Korbi, F. B., Kachour, M., & Newman, V. (2025). Students’ Perspectives on User Engagement and Disengagement in Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) in Higher Education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14697874251360579. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874251360579

Lin, G. Y., Wang, Y. S., & Lee, Y. N. (2023). Investigating factors affecting learning satisfaction and perceived learning in flipped classrooms: the mediating effect of interaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5759-5780. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2018616

Maini, R., Sehgal, S., & Agrawal, G. (2021). Todays' digital natives: an exploratory study on students' engagement and satisfaction towards virtual classes amid COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(5), 454-472. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2021-0055

Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, A., & Chudasama, H. (2023). Sampling methods in research: A review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(3), 762-768.

Mantha, M. S., & Krishna, P. V. (2024). A literature review of learning preferences, motivational factors and training needs among different generations of baby boomers, gen x, gen y and gen z students and professionals. Education and Society, 48(1), 53-64.

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Ng, P. M., Chan, J. K., & Lit, K. K. (2022). Student learning performance in online collaborative learning. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8129-8145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10923-x

Prayogo, A., Khotimah, K., Istiqomah, L., & Maharsi, I. (2024). Students' emotional engagement in online classes: a conceptual framework. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2023-0052

Roque-Hernández, R. V., Díaz-Roldán, J. L., López-Mendoza, A., & Salazar-Hernández, R. (2023). Instructor presence, interactive tools, student engagement, and satisfaction in online education during the COVID-19 Mexican lockdown. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 2841-2854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27342

Schorr, A. (2023, February). The technology acceptance model (TAM) and its importance for digitalization research: A review. In International Symposium on Technikpsychologie (TecPsy) (pp. 55-65). https://doi.org/10.2478/9788366675896-005

Setiawan, B., & Rodgers, A. (2024). Determinants Affecting Students’ Satisfaction In The Use of Learning Management Systems on Instructional Content, Interaction, and Accessibility. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 8(2), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v8i2.89853

Sharif Nia, H., Marôco, J., She, L., Khoshnavay Fomani, F., Rahmatpour, P., Stepanovic Ilic, I., ... & Reardon, J. (2023). Student satisfaction and academic efficacy during online learning with the mediating effect of student engagement: A multi-country study. PLoS One, 18(10), e0285315. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285315

Sjølie, E., Espenes, T. C., & Buø, R. (2022). Social interaction and agency in self-organizing student teams during their transition from face-to-face to online learning. Computers & Education, 189, 104580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104580

Sofa, N., Rakhmi, F. P., Mariam, I., & Onida, M. (2025). Language Learning Strategies Among Vocational Generation Z Students: Insights from A Digital Native Perspective. Journal of English Language Studies, 10(2), 267-288. https://dx.doi.org/10.62870/jels.v10i2.32504

Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Tan, S. F., Ooi, L. H., Ng, L. Y. M., & Sim, T. Y. (2024). Undergraduates’ perception, engagement and learning experience in online learning amid Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Instruction, 17(2), 401-418. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17223a

Vijayakumar Bharathi, S., & Pande, M. B. (2025). Does constructivism learning approach lead to developing creative thinking skills? The mediating role of online collaborative learning environments. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(2), 551-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00321-2

Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Gong, S., Wang, Z., Li, N., & Ai, L. (2022). Interaction and learning engagement in online learning: The mediating roles of online learning self-efficacy and academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 94, 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102128

Wong, W. H., & Chapman, E. (2023). Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education. Higher education, 85(5), 957-978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00874-0

Yang, H., Cai, M., Diao, Y., Liu, R., Liu, L., & Xiang, Q. (2023). How does interactive virtual reality enhance learning outcomes via emotional experiences? A structural equation modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1081372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1081372

Downloads

Published

2026-07-13