Mediating role of instructional and assessment strategies on learners' engagement in Educational statistics, in teachers' training colleges, Mfoundi division.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdl.v1i3.57Keywords:
Statistics , Instruction , EngagementAbstract
Cameroon, like many nations worldwide, is striving to achieve quality basic education and reduce the rate of school dropouts. In this process, teacher-trainers carry an immense responsibility of transmitting relevant and motivational skills to student teachers, ensuring that when they enter the field, they remain mindful of their role in shaping the nation builders of tomorrow. However, one cannot effectively train nation builders without first being a competent educator and critical thinker. This study was designed to examine the extent to which student teachers are responsive to instructional and assessment strategies that promote critical thinking and decision-making skills during field practice for the benefit of future generations. A total sample of 265 student teachers was selected from both a government and a private teacher training institution. Data were collected through questionnaires administered using simple random sampling, yielding a 74.8% response rate. The instrument contained 35 items addressing dependent and independent variables. Data analysis was conducted at the 0.05 significance level using correlation and regression with IBM SPSS version 21. The findings revealed that direct instruction, interactivity, quizzes, and portfolio assessments all correlated positively with student engagement. Quiz-mediated and portfolio-mediated interactivity emerged as the most effective strategies, suggesting that combining these methods offers the greatest potential for enhancing student engagement in educational statistics.
References
Adedeji, S. O., & Olaniyan, O. (2011). Improving the conditions of teachers and teaching in rural schools across African countries (pp. 1-89). Addis Ababa: Unesco-Iicba.
Barrett, H. (2005, December). White paper: Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement.
Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2018). Student participation within teacher education: emphasising democratic values, engagement and learning for a future profession. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1352-1365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1484708
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bonk, C. J., & Zhang, K. (2008). Empowering online learning: 100+ activities for reading, reflecting, displaying, and doing. John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, M. R. A., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, Y. Y. (2019). A reflective thinking‐promoting approach to enhancing graduate students' flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2288-2307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12823
Cinches, M. F. C., Russell, R. L. V., Chavez, J. C., & Ortiz, R. O. (2017). Student engagement: Defining teacher effectiveness and teacher engagement. Journal of Institutional Research South East Asia, 15(1).
Dahleez, K. A., El-Saleh, A. A., Al Alawi, A. M., & Abdelmuniem Abdelfattah, F. (2021). Higher education student engagement in times of pandemic: the role of e-learning system usability and teacher behavior. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1312-1329. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2021-0120
Delialioglu, O., & Yildirim, Z. (2007). Students' perceptions on effective dimensions of interactive learning in a blended learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 133-146. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/52265
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of public economics, 95(7-8), 798-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Human-Vogel, S., & Dippenaar, H. (2013). Exploring pre-service student-teachers' commitment to community engagement in the second year of training. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 188-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.678307
Iqbal, S., & Ali, A. (2024). Education and professional development: Opportunities and challenges for in-service teachers: a review. Gomal University Journal of Research, 40(1), 117-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.51380/gujr-40-01-10
Kamps, D., Wills, H. P., Heitzman-Powell, L., Laylin, J., Szoke, C., Petrillo, T., & Culey, A. (2019). The effects of direct instruction on the reading outcomes of diverse learners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(1), 3–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs13010023
Kamran, F., Kanwal, A., Afzal, A., & Rafiq, S. (2023). Impact of interactive teaching methods on students learning outcomes at university level. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(7), 89-105.
Kuchah, K. (2013). Context-appropriate ELT pedagogy: An investigation in Cameroonian primary schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick).
Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “formative”: assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in physiology education, 42(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00122.2017
Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “formative”: assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in physiology education, 42(1), 5-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00122.2017
Kyei-Blankson, S., & Ntuli, J. (2016). The role of interactivity in student engagement in online learning environments. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(5), 336–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v3n1p48
Leslie, H. J. (2020). Trifecta of student engagement: A framework for an online teaching professional development course for faculty in higher education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 13(2), 149-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2018-0024
Li, J., & Wang, X. (2019). Portfolio-based assessment and learner engagement in STEM education: A case study of middle school students. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1201.01
Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.
Meihami, H., & Esfandiari, R. (2021). Exploring EFL teachers’ professional identity development in a CALL teacher preparation program. The JALT CALL Journal, 17(2), 135-157. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n2.404
Mekolle, P. M. (2024). Management approach to leadership and teachers commitment in secondary schools in Kupe-Muanenguba Division, South West Region of Cameroon. European Journal of Educational Management, 7(4), 245-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eujem.7.4.245
Nadeem, M., Oroszlanyova, M., & Farag, W. (2023). Effect of digital game-based learning on student engagement and motivation. Computers, 12(9), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12090177
Nkwenti, M. F., & Fokum, B. E. (2018). The importance of educational statistics in teacher training in Cameroon: An overview. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(26), 109–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.35293/esi.24
Obena, A. I. (2021). Leadership practices and strategies to resolve teachers’ challenges in Cameroon secondary schools. International Journal of Research publication, 78(1), 18-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.47119/IJRP100781620211986
O'Sullivan, L., & Taylor, T. (2018). Using portfolios to foster student engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(10), 1350–1361.
Powell, S. J., Stevens, E. A., & Miller, K. R. (2017). Direct instruction: A framework for enhancing student engagement. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(2), 107–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1261078
Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–19.
Rostami, F., & Talebinejad, M. (2018). The effect of portfolio assessment on learner engagement and achievement in EFL writing classes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(4), 785–795. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n5p138
Schwille, J., Dembélé, M., & Schubert, J. (2007). Global Perspectives on Teacher Learning: Improving Policy and Practice. International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) UNESCO.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
Smith, J., Johnson, R., & Brown, L. (2015). The impact of quizzes on student engagement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 717–730.
Williams, K., & Chinn, C. (2017). The benefits and challenges of electronic portfolios for student engagement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 197–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.21432/T23W31
Zhang, M. (2021). EFL/ESL teacher’s resilience, academic buoyancy, care, and their impact on students’ engagement: A theoretical review. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 731859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731859
Zhao, Y., Zhao, M., & Shi, F. (2024). Integrating moral education and educational information technology: A strategic approach to enhance rural teacher training in universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(3), 15053-15093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01693-z
Zubizarreta, J. (2009). The learning portfolio: Reflective practice for improving student learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mauve Journal De Leardu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

